A New Generation of Doctors Forgoes a Solo Practice

Changes in medicine make working for someone else more appealing, says retired physician   Young doctors have lost interest in going solo.    A recent survey of doctors-in-training in their final year of residency showed that just 2 percent want a go-it-alone practice.   Instead, their goal is to seek balance between their private and […]

Already an Subcriber? Log in

Get Instant Access to This Article

Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.

Changes in medicine make working for someone else more appealing, says retired physician

 

Young doctors have lost interest in going solo. 

 

A recent survey of doctors-in-training in their final year of residency showed that just 2 percent want a go-it-alone practice.

 

Instead, their goal is to seek balance between their private and professional lives by working for someone else, such as a hospital, clinic, or large group practice. 

That’s according to a survey by MerrittHawkins, a physician staffing firm and subsidiary of AMN Healthcare, which say it is the largest health-care staffing company in the U.S.

 

A mixture of technological advances, health-insurance payment models, corporate-business models, and other factors have brought drastic changes to the medical profession, that have been building for decades.

 

People of my vintage went into medicine for what seemed to be all the right reasons. We expected to work long hours, to be at the call of someone in distress, to sacrifice youth to gain knowledge and experience, and to sacrifice time with family to alleviate the suffering of others.

 

That selfless philosophy makes it all the more puzzling why [my] generation of doctors allowed health care to evolve into an industry more concerned about profits and quarterly earnings than patient care.

 

I think the trend probably began in the early 1960s when physicians declined the opportunity to take an active role in the management of hospitals and health care. Instead, they hired administrators to do that work and did not pay close attention to the results. That was just the beginning of the shift, though. Over time, the groundwork was laid for the practice of medicine to be controlled by the reimbursement polices of insurance companies and corporate business practices. 

 

Physicians lost control of the health-care system and became managers of therapeutic teams. 

 

Today, there is a decreasing emphasis on self-sacrifice and individualism, and an increase in group practice or organizational medicine where hours are predictable. You can’t necessarily blame young doctors for the decisions they are making. It’s just been the natural progression of things.

 

Until the profit motive is purged from medicine, any talk and action to improve the health-care system will be of little or no benefit. There are barriers to those needed changes happening, though, including:

 

*Health care as an industry comprises 18 percent of GDP. No one will tamper with it for fear of uncomfortable or egregious economic fallout. It could have been done during the formation of the Affordable Care Act, but it was not. 

 

*There are far too many stakeholders in the current system to consider shutting it down or even to make large changes. Many industries support health-care organizations with day-to-day services and supplies. Other industries create, provide, and manage the increasingly complex technology used in health care. Entire educational systems, from medical schools to community colleges that train lower-level technical and nursing staff, are engaged in supporting the system. The insurance industry that manages payments is an enormous employer that is itself responsible for driving up the cost of care. Finally, the individuals employed in all of the above are dependent upon the continued functioning of this “out-of-control creation” for their livelihoods.

 

Not all is pessimistic in the world of medicine, though. Technological advances have helped both patients and doctors by providing the tools and knowledge to diagnose disease more accurately and treat it more efficiently.

 

So, while some of the human touch in the doctor/patient relationship is gone, the importance of better patient outcomes shouldn’t be dismissed.

 

Although I find a personal health-care visit to be a sterile interaction, I cannot deny it is more efficient and more effective than the medicine we practiced. Our model has gone, and another has taken its place.

 

J. Joseph Marr, M.D. is a retired academic physician and pharmaceutical and biotechnology executive who lives near Denver. Dr. Marr is the author of more than 200 academic publications, and has authored and edited six books, including “Fall From Grace: A Physician’s Retrospective on the Past Fifty Years of Medicine and the Impact of Social Change.” 

 

 

J. Joseph Marr

Recent Posts

Hochul releases guidelines for $500 million investment fund that’s part of Micron’s deal with the state

ALBANY, N.Y. — Gov. Kathy Hochul on Thursday released guidelines for pursuing funding in the…

2 days ago

FuzeHub to use $1 million NSF award for program focused on advanced materials

ALBANY, N.Y. — FuzeHub says it will use a $1 million award from the National…

2 days ago

Tompkins County seeks developer for emergency shelter

ITHACA, N.Y. — Tompkins County is looking for help designing and building an emergency shelter…

2 days ago

Seneca Foods’ net sales slip 7 percent in latest quarter

FAIRPORT — Seneca Foods Corp. (NASDAQ: SENEA, SENEB) recently reported that its net sales for…

2 days ago
Advertisement

Mower CEO Crockett named Chair of 2024 Walk to End Alzheimer’s

SYRACUSE — The Central New York Chapter of the Alzheimer’s Association recently named Stephanie Crockett…

2 days ago

Binghamton University’s Center for Civic Engagement announces grants for seven community projects

BINGHAMTON — The Stephen David Ross University and Community Projects fund has awarded $28,300 in…

2 days ago