Financial Quarterly Investment Panel

Editor’s Note: The Investment Panel feature appears regularly in our Financial Quarterly publication, spotlighting area investment professionals and their views on the markets and investments. In this issue, we chat with Jim Burns and John Lombardo. 

We interviewed them separately via telephone, but asked the same questions. 

 

James (Jim) Burns, president of J.W. Burns & Company in DeWitt.

John Lombardo, chief investment officer at Blue Water Capital Management, LLC in Syracuse.

Business Journal: What is your view on where the financial markets are headed in the coming months? 

Burns: Well, as you know, we are heading into a hotly contested presidential election, with very competitive Senate and House races as well. Because the economic recovery in the United States depends, to a large extent, on confidence in the direction of our fiscal policy, which will be determined by the election, it is my best guess that we have a volatile five months ahead of us. 

From a longer-term perspective, the key concern for investors remains growth, or the lack thereof. It is clear that the recent economic data has been deteriorating. The U.S. economy is struggling to get to what some people call “escape velocity,” that is, our domestic economy developing enough momentum for the recovery to be self-sustaining. However, considering all the negative headlines that have confronted investors — including stubbornly high unemployment here at home, Europe’s economic mess, the looming U.S. fiscal cliff, and China’s economic slowdown — the fact that the S&P 500 Index is up over 10 percent year- to-date [as of press time] seems to imply the valuations on stocks remain attractive. And if growth can be sustained, even moderate growth, then the global investment landscape does offer many opportunities.

Lombardo: We suspect we probably have seen the highs for the year in the first quarter. The market is facing a lot of headwinds. Challenges would include significantly slower growth in China, recession in a number of European economies, and uneven economic and employment growth in the U.S. Also, slowing revenue and profit growth at American corporations is another challenge. What we’ve seen already this earnings season is the expectation for 2012 S&P 500 earnings growth has dropped by about 2.5 percent basically in the last few weeks since earnings season started. A number of companies have guided analysts’ earnings estimates lower. 

These challenges are likely to result in a choppy market environment. It’s a market that’s likely to respond to both positive and negative headlines on a given day, creating a rather volatile market landscape. 

 Business Journal: What’s your view on the role central bankers and the U.S. fiscal cliff will play in the markets going forward?

Burns: With regards to the central banks, it is obvious that “risk-on” assets — such as stocks, high-yield bonds, and commodities — respond favorably to central-bank efforts to stimulate the economy. Over the last few years, every liquidity intervention by the Federal Reserve has resulted in a significant rally for stocks and other growth-oriented assets. The more serious question that longer-term investors need to consider is how many more “bullets” the Federal Reserve has to stimulate the economy when the economic data weakens, as it has at various points each of the last three years. Interest rates are, as everyone knows, about as low as they can get, so the bond-buying programs that the Federal Reserve embarks on are probably losing their impact over time. So, the issue comes back to “escape velocity” or healthier economic momentum and growth, and this has yet to take hold in the United States or globally. The key issue for investors, as I stated earlier, remains sustainable economic growth.

In terms of the “fiscal cliff,” which is a term Ben Bernanke used to dramatically describe the combination of the expiring of the Bush tax cuts and the massive, automatic government spending cuts, it is simply too early to really forecast what could happen. There are various scenarios that could play out and again, much of this depends on the election results. From an investment standpoint, I counsel my clients that they should take a relatively defensive positioning within their portfolios because the downside risk should no deal be reached is probably greater than the potential upside should a miraculous “grand bargain” be agreed upon by the two major political parties. 

Lombardo: I would suggest that you’re going to see central banks add to the volatility we see in the markets. We think central bankers have been a big part of the so-called risk-on/risk-off trade. To the extent that further economic weakness results in an additional quantitative-easing program by the Federal Reserve and the debt crisis in Europe results in additional easing by the European Central Bank, we are likely to see that type of trade continue. It seems that what we’ve seen is that when the Fed does easing we get a rally until that easing ends and then a selloff after it. So, it has an imperfect and less-than-permanent impact. You see these quantitative-easing rounds have less impact and less long-lasting effects on the markets than before.

Our suspicion is that serious action to reduce the fiscal cliff won’t occur until after the elections. So, the effect will happen late in the year because we don’t expect the sides to come together based on the pattern of action we’ve seen the last two years in Washington, D.C.

Ultimately, what we do expect is the size of the fiscal impact will be reduced but it will be felt early next year. Given that the economy is already slowing and that global growth is slowing, fiscal contraction is increasing the odds of recession beginning late this year and into the first half of next year.

Business Journal: Provide specific recommendations for investments that clients should be making right now. 

Burns: I think investors overall should continue to focus on what I term the three Ds of successful investing: Diversified, Dividends, and Defensive. 

The demand for living income is part of what is pushing up the prices of dividend-paying stocks and various higher-income generating fixed-income securities.

Along these lines, we’re quite bullish on Novartis (ticker: NVS). It has a diverse product line, including its own patented drugs, generic drugs, pet pharmaceuticals, and a strong dividend yield of about 4.2 percent. 

In terms of growth and dividends, we continue to like Apple (ticker: AAPL). It just had an uncharacteristic earnings miss, primarily due to weaker iPhone sales in Europe. That being said, both Apple’s earnings and revenues were up more than 30 percent year over year. And with the stock selling at about 14 times earnings, to us this is a relatively low-risk opportunity. Most importantly, Apple has huge product releases coming up, especially the iPhone 5 and the new Apple TV. 

Finally, my last pick is Chevron (ticker: CVX), which we have owned in our client portfolios for years. It just had a very strong earnings report, earning $7.2 billion in the second quarter on $60 billion in revenue. This is in a period of deteriorating confidence in the European economic situation, which hurt energy prices, and you had a significant decline in the second quarter across the board in energy stocks. However, Chevron is a defensive energy stock and its price held up quite well. It currently yields around 3.2 percent.

Lombardo: We are asset allocators, so we believe in building a well-diversified portfolio. However, given our concerns about economic growth in general and the challenges in Europe specifically, we believe most investors should reduce their risk exposure. And specifically where they take on risk in their portfolio, it makes sense to substitute exposure higher up the capital structure into high-yield bonds or bonds of emerging governments for some of their traditional, what had been equity exposure. You’re going to want to substitute. It’s also an environment where exposure to non-traditional strategies, what might typically be considered hedge-like strategies, are an appropriate part of portfolio construction to reduce the risk in the portfolio. Currently, we utilize the Evercore Wealth Management Macro Opportunity Fund. The aim of the fund is to hedge the risks to a traditional balanced allocation for U.S.-dollar based investors. 

Within high-yield, we prefer the long-short approach because bonds have an asymmetric risk structure. We utilize an outside manager that both buys and sells short bonds.

Business Journal: What do you see as the greatest risks investors need to be aware of and seek to avoid in the coming months? 

Burns: I would say there are two primary risks that seem to catch investors repeatedly. The first is a lack of diversification, or stated another way, the concentration of their portfolio in either risky, or, at the other end of the spectrum, concentrated in risk-free assets, such as cash. I will acknowledge that the headlines that investors are faced with can be frightening. As a result, they can be whipsawed by trying to time the market and either sell out of growth-oriented assets when the outlook is poor, or get very aggressive when markets are doing well. Therefore, investors have to remain diversified and balanced.

The second risk is forcing investment returns that may not be there. If you have not saved enough for retirement and are demanding a 6 percent to 7 percent annualized return over the next five to 10 years, let me suggest that you go back to work or adjust your lifestyle accordingly. More mistakes are made when you have to have an above-average return on your assets. It is clear that we live in challenging economic times, so it is vital that investors accept this and have mature and realistic expectations.

As the late investment author Peter Bernstein once said, “The market is not a very accommodating machine. It won’t provide you high returns just because you need them.”

Lombardo: The greatest risks that investors are facing are … the risk of continued slowing in a global economy, coupled with the risk associated with instability in Europe. Of course, both of these risks tend to reinforce one another. This suggests a more defensive posture to a portfolio in our minds, because the risk to a downside surprise in the markets carries a significantly higher probability than the risk of an upside surprise.