Over the past several years, I have often found myself advising CEOs and ther senior leaders as they navigated confidential, difficult situations that resulted from abrupt organizational changes, professional misconduct, hazardous-materials incidents, product or service failures, cybercrime, natural disasters — or what seemed to be just plain dumb luck. I’ve come to realize that in a […]
Get Instant Access to This Article
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
- Critical Central New York business news and analysis updated daily.
- Immediate access to all subscriber-only content on our website.
- Get a year's worth of the Print Edition of The Central New York Business Journal.
- Special Feature Publications such as the Book of Lists and Revitalize Greater Binghamton, Mohawk Valley, and Syracuse Magazines
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Over the past several years, I have often found myself advising CEOs and ther senior leaders as they navigated confidential, difficult situations that resulted from abrupt organizational changes, professional misconduct, hazardous-materials incidents, product or service failures, cybercrime, natural disasters — or what seemed to be just plain dumb luck.
I’ve come to realize that in a fast-paced, digital world, these events now go viral at lightning speed. How they are managed and what is communicated can make the difference between the survival or destruction of an organization’s reputation.
And that doesn’t always mean just spilling your guts.
It’s not unusual for organizations facing sensitive or difficult circumstances to seek trusted counsel from both their attorneys as well as public-relations professionals. What is unusual is to have them work cooperatively together on behalf of the client.
Early in my career, I would watch my traditional PR colleagues advise their companies to go public early and provide all the information possible on a given sensitive matter, while the organization’s attorney might advise the client to say nothing, speak to no one, and offer only “no comment” to anyone who inquired.
Neither approach seemed very strategic to me, nor focused on the best, long-term interests of the organization. I promised myself that if I were ever in a position to impact how sensitive and crisis communications were done, I would find a way to work closely with legal counsel in a team approach to ensure the business legal strategy was preserved, while at the same time protecting and advancing the organization’s reputation and good name.
Certainly, there are highly charged situations — like lawsuits — when an organization has to be extremely careful what it says publicly. However, it’s often possible to offer some information to key audiences while protecting the privacy of those involved, and to state that given an ongoing legal proceeding, comments will need to remain limited. That all makes sense, and sounds a lot better than wielding “no comment” as the standard line.
If you have access to in-house counsel, don’t wait for a serious situation to get them involved with your communication strategies. They can give some good guidance on positioning your good news, too.
Legal and communications professionals have your best interests in mind. However, to get the best combination of advice for your business, don’t be afraid to call them into the same room or conference call to find that common sensed, common ground.
You and your organization will have a better outcome as a result.
Michael Meath is a senior consultant at Strategic Communications, LLC, which says it provides trusted counsel for public relations, including media relations, employee relations, and community relations. Contact Meath at mmeath@stratcomllc.com