Stay up-to-date on the companies, people and issues that impact businesses in Syracuse, Central New York and beyond.
Johnny Rockets reopens at Destiny USA following renovation project
SYRACUSE — Johnny Rockets, the 1940s-themed restaurant at Destiny USA, has reopened following a nearly weeklong renovation project. The eatery temporarily closed during construction on June 8 and reopened June 14, Destiny USA said in a news release. The restaurant is located on the second level near Williams-Sonoma. Some of the new features include new […]
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
SYRACUSE — Johnny Rockets, the 1940s-themed restaurant at Destiny USA, has reopened following a nearly weeklong renovation project.
The eatery temporarily closed during construction on June 8 and reopened June 14, Destiny USA said in a news release.
The restaurant is located on the second level near Williams-Sonoma.
Some of the new features include new paneling throughout the kitchen and dining area; new lighting fixtures; upgraded booths, bar stools, and other seating; and new décor throughout the restaurant, Destiny USA said.
The upgrades to Johnny Rockets makes it look like a “new restaurant,” Sara Wallace, director of marketing of Destiny USA, said.
“We’re happy to see some of our oldest tenants remodeling to make their space as comfortable as possible for customers. Johnny Rockets has been a staple at Destiny USA since [it] opened in 1999,” Wallace said.
Johnny Rockets is also planning to open a restaurant at Syracuse Hancock International Airport this year, likely in the third quarter.
Empire State manufacturing index edges up in June
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York reported June 16 that its Empire State Manufacturing Survey general business-conditions index inched up 0.3 points to 19.3 in June. The index in May rose nearly 18 points to 19, its highest level in nearly four years. Following that strong rise, economists and analysts had been expecting the
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York reported June 16 that its Empire State Manufacturing Survey general business-conditions index inched up 0.3 points to 19.3 in June.
The index in May rose nearly 18 points to 19, its highest level in nearly four years.
Following that strong rise, economists and analysts had been expecting the index to decline several points in June, according to Yahoo Finance data, but it didn’t happen.
The June survey found that 40 percent of New York manufacturers reported that conditions had improved over the last month, while 21 percent said that conditions had worsened, the New York Fed said.
The survey also found the new-orders index climbed eight points to 18.4, its highest level in four years.
The shipments index fell three points but, at 14.2, still pointed to a “significant expansion” in shipments over the month.
The unfilled orders index remained at -1.1, indicating that the level of unfilled orders was “largely stable.”
The delivery time index rose two points to 1.1. The inventories index rose seven points to 9.7, indicating that inventory levels were “somewhat higher” in June.
The indexes for both prices paid and prices received were slightly lower, indicating a “slowing” in the pace of price increases, according to the New York Fed.
The prices-paid index fell three points to 17.2, and the prices-received index fell two points to 4.3.
Labor-market conditions continued to improve, the New York Fed said.
After “surging” last month, the index for number of employees fell back to 10.8, suggesting that employment levels continued to climb, though at a “more modest” pace than last month.
The average-workweek index moved up seven points to 9.7, pointing to an increase in hours worked.
Indexes for the six-month outlook remained “highly optimistic,” with the future new orders and shipments indexes recording “notable” gains, the New York Fed said.
The index for future general business conditions fell four points, but remained “high” at 39.8.
The future new-orders index climbed to 44.5, and the index for expected shipments rose 11 points to 45.2.
Indexes for expected prices were “somewhat” higher, with the future prices-paid index rising five points to 36.6 and the index for future prices received climbing two points to 16.1, according to the survey.
The index for expected number of employees rose to 20.4, and the future average-workweek index rose to zero.
The capital-expenditures index fell for a second consecutive month, dropping to 11.8, a sign that even though capital-spending plans were generally “positive,” firms expected spending growth to slow.
The technology-spending index was “little changed” at 3.2, suggesting only a slight increase in technology spending, the survey found.
The New York Fed distributes the Empire State Manufacturing Survey on the first day of each month to the same pool of about 200 manufacturing executives in New York.
On average, about 100 executives return responses, it says.
Contact Reinhardt at ereinhardt@cnybj.com
Mathew Tully returns to Tully Rinckey law firm following military retirement
SYRACUSE — Tully Rinckey PLLC Founding Partner Mathew B. Tully has returned to his law firm after taking military leave in early 2012 to serve as a lieutenant colonel in Afghanistan with the Army National Guard. Retired Lieutenant Colonel Tully retakes the reins at the multi-million law firm, based in Albany with an office in
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
SYRACUSE — Tully Rinckey PLLC Founding Partner Mathew B. Tully has returned to his law firm after taking military leave in early 2012 to serve as a lieutenant colonel in Afghanistan with the Army National Guard.
Retired Lieutenant Colonel Tully retakes the reins at the multi-million law firm, based in Albany with an office in Syracuse, that is substantially larger than when he left for military duty, Tully Rinckey said in a news release.
Tully’s return to the law firm marks a new stage in his legal career and the end of a distinguished military career that spanned nearly two decades, the firm said. On May 5, he was medically retired from the U.S. Army, following a long recovery from injuries he sustained during a suicide bomber attack involving a vehicle-borne improvised explosive device (or VBIED) on Aug. 7, 2012. As a result of his service in Afghanistan, Tully was awarded the Combat Action Badge in May 2012, the Purple Heart in September 2012, and Bronze Star in February 2013.
Having previously been deployed to Iraq in 2005 and Egypt in 2007, this is not the first time Tully has returned to his law firm after completing his military duty, the news release noted. Unlike his prior returns to the firm, he is now among the tens of thousands of veterans of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom who are transitioning back to civilian life while dealing with a service-connected disability. Tully has also permanently returned to civilian life, having ended a military career that began in 1991 when he first put on a military uniform as a part of Hofstra University’s Reserve Officer’s Training Corps (ROTC) program.
Tully has also returned to a law firm that has grown considerably since his departure. In Tully’s absence, Tully Rinckey Managing Partner Greg T. Rinckey handled the day-to-day affairs of the firm. It now has six offices, compared to the three it had when Tully went to Afghanistan. While he was on active duty, the law firm’s revenue grew by 49.1 percent in 2013, the release stated.
In April, Tully Rinckey relocated its K Street office in Washington, D.C. to a recently redeveloped LEED-Platinum certified building a block away from the White House.
Shortly after Tully survived the suicide-bomber attack, Tully Rinckey opened its second upstate New York office in Syracuse on Aug. 30, 2012.
The firm went on to open offices in Buffalo in January, 2013 and Rochester in July, 2013. Tully Rinckey says it plans to relocate its downtown Buffalo location to a considerably larger office within the next two months. This new office is about five times larger than the space it currently occupies in the city. Firmwide, Tully Rinckey employs more than 120 people, including nearly 60 attorneys.
The news release stated that Tully has dedicated his legal career to strengthening the employment rights of service members through his pioneering Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) litigation. USERRA protects civilian job rights and benefits for veterans and members of the active and reserve components of the U.S. armed forces.
Although Tully returned to the United States from Afghanistan in early fall 2012, he remained on active duty as he recovered from his injuries. He initially received treatment at a Wounded Warrior Unit in Fort Benning, Ga. and later at another Wounded Warrior Unit in Concord, Mass. He was prohibited from working in a civilian capacity until his medical retirement took effect in May.
Estate tax, CPA-firm ownership rules top the state’s accounting topics
SYRACUSE — Changing estate-tax laws and potential changes to rules on who can own a CPA firm are two topics that have generated some buzz in the accounting industry of late, according to local certified public accountants (CPAs). Effective April 1, New York began exempting more estates from the state estate tax to get more
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
SYRACUSE — Changing estate-tax laws and potential changes to rules on who can own a CPA firm are two topics that have generated some buzz in the accounting industry of late, according to local certified public accountants (CPAs).
Effective April 1, New York began exempting more estates from the state estate tax to get more in line with federal exemptions. Between now and 2019, the state’s exemption will increase in steps from the previous $1 million, all the way up to $5.34 million to meet the federal exemption. New York’s current exemption is now just over $2 million. The move to raise the estate-tax exemption is good news for many New Yorkers, says Steven Stanek, a CPA with Daley, LaCombe & Charette P.C. in Manlius.
In the past, he says, he’s seen people who didn’t owe federal estate taxes often taken by surprise to learn they owed estate taxes on the state level. The new changes should alleviate that for many, especially years down the road as the exemption continues to rise.
However, there is a fault in the new legislation that could catch estates that just exceed the exemption with a high tax rate, Stanek says.
“Where the problem lies is in the tax calculation,” he says. Estates that are just $1 over the exemption could be hit with tax rates in excess of 100 percent.
According to the New York State Society of CPAs (NYSSCPA), the fault comes from the accelerated phase-out of a tax credit often used to shrink the size of an estate. Estates that exceed the exemption by 5 percent or less will find it increasingly difficult to use the credit, according to the NYSSCPA.
Ultimately, the estate-tax exemption change is expected to benefit about 90 percent of New York households that would have paid tax under the old $1 million limit.
“That’s a pretty big chunk of New Yorkers,” Stanek says. “For the most part, I think it’s going to offer relief to [many] New Yorkers.”
CPA ownership rules
Another proposed change affects CPA firms directly. Currently, CPA firms must be owned by a certified public account, who is governed by the ethics of the profession.
However, proposed state legislation would open up firm ownership to non-CPAs — something that draws mixed reaction from the accounting community.
The issue is one that the “Big 4” accounting firms have promoted off and on for more than two decades, says Thomas Riley, a CPA and partner with Testone,
Marshall & Discenza CPAs in Syracuse. The Big 4 — Deloitte, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Ernst & Young, and KPMG — have long lobbied for expanded ownership options, Riley contends.
Such a change, however, would raise some concerns, he notes. As a CPA, Riley says he is bound by industry-specific ethics. A non-CPA owner wouldn’t be bound by those same ethics, he says, and it raises the question of how non-CPA owners would be disciplined.
“People wonder if it’s going to hurt the profession,” Riley says.
The proposed legislation would amend education law to allow non-CPAs to be minority owners of CPA firms, something already allowed in 49 other states.
However, a licensed CPA must still hold a simple majority of the ownership, be responsible for the registration of the firm, and be in charge of attest services. All non-CPA owners must be actively engaged in working for the firm as passive ownership is not permitted under the legislation.
Connecticut passed similar legislation in 2012.
While acknowledging concerns, Stanek points out that the change could also help the profession.
“I think it’s a good thing,” he says, particularly at a time when more and more small firms are looking for merger options. Businesses today need to merge resources
in order to be competitive, he says, and this change would open opportunities for a small CPA firm to join forces with, for example, a financial planner to create a jointly owned firm that can now offer more services to clients.
This would allow two professionals to merge their businesses without one having to give up all ownership rights, Stanek says. It gives businesses more options.
The bill, sponsored by State Sen. Kenneth Lavalle (R–Long Island), is currently before the New York State Legislature’s Higher Education Committee.
Contact The Business Journal News Network at news@cnybj.com
New York State Bar Association names Watson as new executive director
The New York State Bar Association has named David R. Watson to serve as the next executive director of the 75,000-member association. Watson, who is currently executive director of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association, succeeds Patricia K. Bucklin, who stepped down in March after nearly 13 years as the New York State Bar Association’s executive
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
The New York State Bar Association has named David R. Watson to serve as the next executive director of the 75,000-member association.
Watson, who is currently executive director of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association, succeeds Patricia K. Bucklin, who stepped down in March after nearly 13 years as the New York State Bar Association’s executive director.
As executive director, Watson will oversee the day-to-day operations of the association and help implement policies approved by its House of Delegates and Executive Committee. The association says it has 125 employees at its Albany headquarters and nearby print shop.
“We are delighted that Dave Watson has agreed to join us as executive director. He is a highly regarded bar executive with excellent management skills and experience in business and in the legal profession, including as a practicing lawyer,” the association’s immediate past president, David M. Schraver of Rochester (Nixon Peabody LLP), said in a news release.
Watson brings to the New York State Bar Association his experience as a manager of three law-related associations and a legal technology company, as well as a practicing attorney and financial advisor, according to the release.
Since 2010, he has been executive director of the 6,000-member Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association.
The 75,000-member New York State Bar Association says it is the largest voluntary state bar association in the nation. It has members in all 50 states, Washington, D.C., and 120 countries. It was founded in 1876.
New York State Bar Association announces new executive-committee members
Even attorneys have been elected to the Executive Committee of the New York State Bar Association. The 30-member Executive Committee oversees the management and administration of the state bar within policies determined by its governing body, the House of Delegates, according to the association. The new executive-committee members include the following six lawyers from Upstate:
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Even attorneys have been elected to the Executive Committee of the New York State Bar Association.
The 30-member Executive Committee oversees the management and administration of the state bar within policies determined by its governing body, the House of Delegates, according to the association.
The new executive-committee members include the following six lawyers from Upstate:
– Alyssa M. Barreiro of Binghamton, vice president of the 6th Judicial District. A graduate of Binghamton University and the Syracuse University College of Law, Barreiro is a partner of Levene Gouldin & Thompson. She is the founder and chair of the Health Law Practice Group.
– T. Andrew Brown of Rochester, vice president of the 7th Judicial District. A graduate of Syracuse University and University of Michigan Law School, Brown is the corporation counsel for the City of Rochester and managing partner of Brown & Hutchinson.
– Hermes Fernandez of Albany, vice president of the 3rd Judicial District. A graduate of Le Moyne College and Syracuse University College of Law, Fernandez is a member of Bond, Schoeneck & King. He is co-chair of the firm’s Health Practice Group.
– Bryan D. Hetherington of Rochester, member-at-large. A graduate of LaSalle College and Cornell Law School, Hetherington is the chief counsel of the Empire Justice Center.
– Elena DeFio Kean of Albany, member-at-large. A graduate of the College of Saint Rose and Albany Law School, Kean is a partner of Towne, Ryan & Partners. She concentrates her practice on labor and employment and municipal law matters.
– Stuart J. LaRose of Syracuse, vice president of the 5th Judicial District. A graduate of Le Moyne College and Western New England University School of Law, LaRose is a solo practitioner. He concentrates his practice in family law and criminal law.
Their terms began on June 1.
The 75,000-member New York State Bar Association says it is the largest voluntary state bar association in the nation. It was founded in 1876.θ
Contact The Business Journal News Network at news@cnybj.com
The Rewards of Employing Individuals With Disabilities
Far and away the best prize that life has to offer is the chance to work hard at work worth doing. — Theodore Roosevelt “You do realize that each of us has some form of disability or flaw? No one is perfect.” I responded with my standard quote, “It’s just that certain disabilities are more
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Far and away the best prize that life has to offer is the chance to work hard at work worth doing. — Theodore Roosevelt
“You do realize that each of us has some form of disability or flaw? No one is perfect.”
I responded with my standard quote, “It’s just that certain disabilities are more visible than others.”
This brief interchange has occurred dozens of times during my career in serving and supporting tax-exempt disability service providers. A recent repeat of this interchange prompts the topic for this column. That is, meaningful employment of individuals with disabilities.
The federal government, as a result of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Supreme Court decision known as Olmstead, is on a mission. Individuals with disabilities are guaranteed by law, supported by the Supreme Court, to receive services and be involved in all activities (residential, employment, transportation, etc.) in the most integrated, least restrictive setting appropriate for their needs and abilities. Conceptually, I think we can all agree that this is good public policy. However, the ramifications of implementing these requirements are causing tremendous anxiety and disruption to individuals with disabilities, particularly in the area of integrated employment opportunities.
By way of background, in July 2013, the federal government through the Center for Medicare Services (CMS) effectively began the termination of more than 10,000 individuals with disabilities who have been employed in a workshop setting, in some cases for more than five decades. In January 2014, the federal Department of Justice settled a consent decree with the state of Rhode Island that is resulting in a similar termination of more than 2,500 individuals with disabilities who have been meaningfully employed in that state’s workshops.
While we can all agree that integrated community-based employment opportunities are desirable for every one with disabilities, the fact is that not every individual with disabilities can be successful in an integrated employment workplace.
Success stories
Before I provide specific recommendations regarding employing individuals with disabilities, here are some real-world success stories. Only the names have been changed to protect their identities.
So let me tell you about Bill, Carol, and Roger. After reading their stories, I am hopeful that you will begin to look for opportunities to employ individuals with disabilities. They most certainly deserve that opportunity.
Bill, known to his friends as “Wild Bill,” is a gregarious, fun-loving individual who happened to be born with a serious case of cerebral palsy. Bill was able to stay at home with his loving parents and his seven siblings for his first 40 years. He now lives in a group home in upstate New York. Bill and I are good friends and we go to movies, bowling, and various sporting events together.
Bill’s parents owned a sawmill and lumber yard. Bill is very proud that, at age 14, under the supervision of his father and brothers, he was able to operate the “barker” machine. The barker, I learned, removed the bark from the trees after they arrived at the saw mill. Now, some 40 years later, Bill works multiple jobs, including volunteering at the Salvation Army, stocking shelves at the Coalition Grocery store, and serving on a janitorial cleaning crew.
Bill shares a common attribute with almost all other individuals with disabilities. That is, they want to work and be productive at anything they are capable of doing.
Carol works as a receptionist and administrative assistant in our Geneva, N.Y. office. She assists our office manager and has done so faithfully for the past seven years. Carol has been a breath of fresh air, with her caring personality and her candy contributions. In her ongoing attempts to change the “dull and boring” stereotype of the accountant she works with, both she and he have benefitted immensely from her work effort. She is truly one of us, which is what integrated work opportunities are all about.
Finally, here is the amazing story of Roger, who works as an IT consultant for our firm. You see, Roger was born deaf and without ears. His parents were told, while he was still in the hospital, that “you might be better off putting him in an institution; he will be a burden on your lives and society.” Roger grew up painfully shy because of his disability. However, his parents were both outraged by the advice provided and determined to make sure that Roger lived a “normal” life. In Roger’s view, his parents, through their determination, saved him from a life of “being disabled.”
At a young age, Roger was fortunate to be fitted with a hearing device. During his youth and early adulthood, he was able to serve as a lifeguard, camp counselor, disc jockey, and audio-visual director. As he told me recently, “Who would think that a guy without ears would do any of those listening-intensive jobs?” And, in a note of irony, Roger likes to quote the social worker who said jokingly, “Gee, for a guy without ears, you sure do listen well.”
Roger, as an adult, is married with children and remains actively involved in a number of organizations supporting both deaf individuals and others with disabilities. My favorite quote from Roger is one that applies to all individuals with disabilities. His personal mantra is “if you surround yourself with coconuts, you become a coconut.” To be clear, his position is that he would have become developmentally disabled by being treated as developmentally disabled.
So there you have three of literally hundreds of similar stories that I have heard and observed over my 40-year career. Individuals with disabilities truly want “a hand up, not a handout.” And the best thing that you could provide to them, and what they want most of all, is meaningful employment. As with all of us, it gives our life purpose, meaning, and satisfaction.
I hope that I have tugged at your heartstrings. But individuals with disabilities don’t want your sympathy, they want the following:
Enough said on this topic. Now it is time for each of us to be responsible in our response to the need and in our actions.
Gerald J. Archibald, CPA, is a partner in charge of the management advisory services at The Bonadio Group. Contact him at (585) 381-1000, or email: garchibald@bonadio.com
The Leader’s Role in Implementing Strategy
Leadership is critical to successful strategy implementation and execution. In my work with CEOs, I’ve found that leaders often appreciate tips and techniques on how they can best lead a new strategy. Here are 10 of the most important leadership factors to lead a strategy implementation and ensure its success. Take the leadBe visible. Communicate
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Leadership is critical to successful strategy implementation and execution. In my work with CEOs, I’ve found that leaders often appreciate tips and techniques on how they can best lead a new strategy. Here are 10 of the most important leadership factors to lead a strategy implementation and ensure its success.
Take the lead
Be visible. Communicate all the time, both formally (presentations, intranet, etc.) and informally (when you’re meeting with employees.) The most effective leaders are continually talking about the strategy, providing insights about what the big picture is, and using the strategy to make decisions. When you implement a strategy, you are taking your organization into the future, so give your people a very clear picture of where you are headed, get people to buy in and change how the organization thinks about itself. Employees want to hear strategy directly from the top. I’ve seen CEOs of Fortune 500 companies and leading professional firms talk with small groups about strategy; it has a very strong impact. Projects and timelines are critically important, but don’t confuse those with leadership.
Prioritize
Strategy is about making choices about what you will do, and equally important, what you won’t do. If you’re trying to be world-class in everything, then it’s highly likely that you don’t have a god strategy to begin with. Focus on the few most important initiatives and drive them forward a mile instead of trying to move everything forward an inch.
Build strong buy-in among your top team
Heads nodding in agreement during a strategy session are not a measure of buy-in. You need every senior leader to be strongly advancing the strategy by publicly (and privately) supporting it, and by demonstrating support through their actions and behaviors: How they communicate and make decisions. This is the number one reason why strategies don’t get implemented successfully.
I was retained by a gas and electric utility to help them understand and overcome employee resistance to a major organizational change. Here’s what the problem was: Members of the senior leadership team, all of whom supported the change, were directing their people to tackle immediate needs within their functional organizations before working on the change. To employees, that meant that the major change wasn’t a priority, so they resisted it.
Allocate resources to achieve the strategy
Similar to the previous factor, make sure the key strategic initiatives are adequately staffed and given the appropriate resources to get the job done. If you don’t, the strategy will go on the back burner or be seen as an add-on to everyday tasks.
Objectively assess the skills needed
You have to be very tough on this one. If the skills aren’t there, you need to take action to correct it, or change the strategy. A consumer-goods manufacturer I worked with formulated a strategy that called for a continual stream of new products. That required top-notch product development — beyond the capability of the current organization.
Don’t underestimate the importance of implementation skills
There are effective and ineffective ways to drive change in organizations. You want an organization that embraces change and is eager to make it happen. But all too often, change is ineffective and the result is short-term and superficial with an alienated workforce. You’ve got to have the right implementation skills, and they are not normally found within most organizations. This is the number two reason why strategies don’t get implemented successfully.
Make the strategic tactical
Drive strategies down to individual performance objectives and decision-making. Foster both accountability and transparency. You want everyone accountable for their part in achieving strategic objectives, and you want everyone to know how well they are doing. This usually means that jobs will have to change to reflect the strategy. If you have a new strategy, and people’s jobs don’t change, or if the strategic tasks are additional work, something is wrong with the implementation.
Strategic focus
Keep its attention on achieving strategic objectives and head-off the tangents and diversions that are all too alluring to organizations. Functional groups are constantly coming up with their own projects that may meet their own agendas, but which distract from the strong focus on the strategy. It’s up to the leaders to watch for this and head it off, even if it feels like “Whack-a-Mole” at times.
Be personally involved in moving forward the few most important strategic initiatives
Not running them. And certainly not micro-managing them. But making sure that everyone knows which initiatives are most important and that you are closely watching the progress.
Engage the organization
Both intellectually and emotionally. Slide presentations about strategy rarely connect. A good story will.
Robert Legge is president of Legge & Company LLC, based in Lyons in Wayne County. He assists organizations to significantly improve outcomes with changes to strategy implementation, leadership, and organizational focus. His clients have included United Airlines, Paychex, Rich Products, the American Hospitals Association, and the Rochester-Genesee Valley Regional Transit Authority. Contact Legge at boblegge@boblegge.com
President further inflates the student-loan bubble
Just how big is the student-loan bubble? America’s college and university students now owe more than $1.2 trillion for their education, more than double the amount owed in 2007. The obligation impacts 37 million borrowers. The size of the debt is staggering, but of even more concern is the rate of expansion of the trend
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Just how big is the student-loan bubble?
America’s college and university students now owe more than $1.2 trillion for their education, more than double the amount owed in 2007. The obligation impacts 37 million borrowers. The size of the debt is staggering, but of even more concern is the rate of expansion of the trend and the concomitant rate of default. In just the last dozen years, the total amount borrowed annually has rocketed from $65.2 billion to $110.3 billion. The number of individuals with federally subsidized and unsubsidized loans has increased by almost 70 percent during the same period. During the recent recession, student debt was the only debt to increase. Today, 5.4 million borrowers are in default, a 15 percent rate. The Congressional Budget Office projects that the federal loan program will cost taxpayers $95 billion over the next decade.
The origins of the crisis began with Sputnik, a satellite the Soviets launched into space. Afraid that America was losing its competitive position, Congress passed the National Education Defense Act in 1958, which set up the first, federal student-loan program. The law created loan-insurance funds at universities to attract students pursuing a post-secondary education in science, math, and foreign languages. To qualify, students needed excellent grades, ability and/or preparation in a relevant field, and an interest in teaching.
Limits on the program were lifted during President Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society agenda. Suddenly, all students with any interest were eligible. The new law created the Guaranteed Student Loan Program (now known as the Stafford Loan program), which granted the government the right to pay part of the interest on private student loans and capped the interest rates. In every decade thereafter, Congress expanded the program further, and in 2010, squeezed out the private-lender market, replacing it by making direct loans to students rather than just insuring them.
Throwing more money at it
President Barack Obama’s answer to the impending implosion of the federal student-loan programs is to throw more money at the problem — taxpayer money. With the stroke of his pen on June 9, he signed an executive memorandum that expanded the already generous terms of “pay-as-you-earn,” an option that limits monthly student-loan repayments to a borrower’s discretionary income. (Discretionary income is computed by subtracting the poverty line that corresponds to your family size and the state in which you live from your adjusted gross income.)
Our president lowered the repayment cap from 15 percent to 10 percent. The program includes loan forgiveness after 20 years if you work in the private sector and 10 years if you work for government or for a nonprofit corporation. With the stroke of his pen, our chief executive has shifted still more of the financial burden off the direct beneficiary of the largesse and onto the hapless taxpayer. How much burden? Secretary of Education Arne Duncan said that the administration doesn’t yet know how much the expanded payment cap will cost. “We’ll figure it out on the back end,” he said. Now, that’s reassuring.
His actions, however, do nothing to address the heart of the problem — the rising tuition cost of our colleges and universities. For at least three decades, the cost has risen, on average, 6 percent — or three times the rate of inflation. The driver is the very federal programs designed to help students attend institutions of higher education. Universal loan programs increase the number of people who can pay the tuition along with the supply of money available. As Judah Bellin points out in the spring 2014 edition of National Affairs, schools can continually raise their tuition because federal aid is tied directly to the cost of attendance at an individual school.
Bellin explains: To receive aid, a college first determines the total cost to attend. After computing a student’s contribution, which is determined by a Congressional formula, the college then calculates the aid a student can receive. After adding up all of the student aid available, the institution makes a request to the federal government, with no limit on the amount requested, as long as it doesn’t exceed the mandated formula for eligibility. Bottom line: the federal, student-loan program is an individually tailored subsidy for colleges and universities.
I recognize that our presidents and successive Congresses can’t resist expanding every federal program, especially one supporting education. They are largely oblivious to the law of unintended consequences, focusing only on the “noble” goal and perhaps knowing that the inevitable fallout will be someone else’s crisis. But I also have to take students and their parents to task for being sucked in by the lure of easy money. The dilemma is wrapped up in a few statistics: 75 percent of Americans think college is too expensive, 57 percent don’t think there is an adequate return on the investment, yet 94 percent of parents expect their kids to attend college. Go figure!
There are a number of answers to the problem of skyrocketing post-secondary education, including phasing out the government’s loan program, capping the federal commitment, instituting performance standards for student eligibility, introducing more technology into teaching to help drive productivity improvement, cutting administrative bloat, and using private-equity funds, to name a few. This would also be a good time to re-examine the idea that everybody should go to college and rethink our vocational-education track to provide industry with trained workers. Above all else, disconnect the current loan programs from the college administrators who set the tuition rates and light a fire under the parents and students to act like consumers. Stop shielding them from the marketplace.
College is an opportunity; it is not a right. The current system of funding student loans is unsustainable. Today, 45 percent of recent graduates either can’t find jobs or have jobs that don’t require a college degree. There are plenty of ways to fix this problem. The only thing lacking is the will.
Norman Poltenson is a regional staff writer and publisher emeritus with The Business Journal News Network. Contact him at npoltenson@cnybj.com
WAER-FM to expand daily news and information programming
SYRACUSE — WAER FM 88.3 announced it will change its daily programming schedule on June 30, in response to research that “shows an increased demand
Stay up-to-date on the companies, people and issues that impact businesses in Syracuse, Central New York and beyond.