Stay up-to-date on the companies, people and issues that impact businesses in Syracuse, Central New York and beyond.
Harris Beach launches collegiate-sports practice group
Harris Beach PLLC, a Rochester–based law firm with an office in Syracuse, has introduced a national collegiate-sports practice group. The USA collegiate-sports practice group provides a range of legal services related to the compliance and operational issues of running a college-athletics program. The nine attorneys involved have worked on these matters previously, says Brian Mahoney, […]
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Harris Beach PLLC, a Rochester–based law firm with an office in Syracuse, has introduced a national collegiate-sports practice group.
The USA collegiate-sports practice group provides a range of legal services related to the compliance and operational issues of running a college-athletics program.
The nine attorneys involved have worked on these matters previously, says Brian Mahoney, a partner in Harris Beach’s Buffalo office, who leads the USA collegiate-sports practice group.
“We just decided to … formalize our collective experience with this practice group and that has come about … this month,” Mahoney says.
Mahoney practices in the government compliance and investigations team and the commercial-litigation practice group.
He also handles National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) matters including compliance and student-athlete eligibility issues.
Two attorneys in the Syracuse office, David Martin and Donald Martin, who are brothers, are also part of Harris Beach’s new collegiate-sports practice group.
The firm can also call upon other attorneys in the local office or other Harris Beach offices for matters that fall into this legal area, if need be, Mahoney says.
The practice group is composed of attorneys from several disciplines to address issues related to NCAA regulations, Title IX compliance, student-athlete eligibility, club sports, coach-player conduct, sponsorships and contractual arrangements, staffing and personnel, risk management and liability issues, drug testing, hazing and other topics.
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 is a federal statute that was created to prohibit sex discrimination in education programs that receive federal-financial assistance, according to the website of the NCAA. Nearly every educational institution is a recipient of federal funds and is required to comply with Title IX, the website says.
Besides Harris Beach attorneys, the practice group also includes Bridget Niland, an attorney with “extensive experience working at the NCAA,” according to Mahoney.
She worked at the NCAA office in Indianapolis for a number of years, handling compliance and other issues, he says.
Niland, who is also a professor at Daemen College in Buffalo, still works on matters pertaining to the NCAA and serves as a consultant on Division I membership issues for Harris Beach on this practice group, Mahoney says.
Harris Beach has also started a USA collegiate-sports blog on its website as a forum to discuss issues affecting colleges and universities, athletic directors, coaches, administrators, and trustees, the firm said.
Founded in 1856 and headquartered in Pittsford, near Rochester, Harris Beach has more than 200 lawyers in offices that include Syracuse, Albany, Buffalo, Ithaca, New York City, Saratoga Springs, Uniondale, and White Plains, along with New Haven, Conn. and Newark, N.J.
Syracuse–based Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC is another area law firm that has a collegiate-sports practice group. On its web site, Bond says its practice group represents colleges and universities in NCAA rules compliance, eligibility, and infractions matters.
Contact Reinhardt at ereinhardt@cnybj.com
Valpak targets Syracuse as a franchise market in 2014
Valpak, a Largo, Fla.–based company that specializes in direct mailing of local print and digital coupons to consumers, recently announced it is targeting the Syracuse area as one of 18 areas to add franchise territories this year. Valpak is the doing-business-as name (or dba) of Valpak Direct Marketing Systems, Inc., according to its website. The
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Valpak, a Largo, Fla.–based company that specializes in direct mailing of local print and digital coupons to consumers, recently announced it is targeting the Syracuse area as one of 18 areas to add franchise territories this year.
Valpak is the doing-business-as name (or dba) of Valpak Direct Marketing Systems, Inc., according to its website.
The company said the other areas it’s targeting include Miami, Fla., San Diego, Calif., New Orleans, La., and Corpus Christi, Texas.
The Syracuse–area territory will include four counties — Onondaga, Oswego, Cayuga, and Madison, says Greg Courchane, Valpak’s new director of franchise sales
“The potential is for about 220,000 households. The opportunity would probably start with 30[,000] or 40,000 and then grow,” Courchane says.
For the size of the franchise market, Valpak is seeking one person to hold the territorial sales rights and wants to award the franchise this year.
“We’re hoping as soon as we can find a candidate that’s interested in doing this type of a business,” Courchane says.
Valpak’s primary product is a blue-colored envelope full of offers from local and national merchants that is mailed to households in a given franchise market. The products could include everything from pizza to automotive accessories to home improvement, he says.
“The franchise owner would be working with small and medium [-sized] businesses in the greater Syracuse area soliciting their advertising dollars,” Courchane says.
Valpak sells advertising for both print and digital media.
At the start, the franchise owner will work as a sales representative for Valpak, while the parent company helps with printing and mailing the envelopes, according to Courchane.
Initially, the individual will work from his or her home to avoid the expense of maintaining an office, he says.
Ideal candidates for Valpak-franchise ownership should have the desire to work within a franchise system, develop relationships with local businesses, and have a comfort level with selling new, digital technologies, Courchane says. Franchisees should also possess a minimum liquidity of $75,000, and a minimum net worth of $150,000, he adds.
Valpak also waives start-up fees for returning military veterans, and making it easier for them to go into business for themselves.
Valpak’s offering is part of “Operation Enduring Opportunity,” a program developed by the International Franchise Association with the goal to hire and recruit 75,000 veterans as franchise business owners by 2014.
Interested candidates can visit the company’s website, www.valpakfranchising.com
Valpak closed out 2013 with the signing of 13 franchise agreements, which increased household circulation by two million additional homes, the company said.
Those markets included San Francisco; Coastal Carolina; Florida’s Atlantic Coast; Lake Charles, La., Eastern Suffolk County, N.Y.; Kent & Sussex County, Del.; Grand Rapids, Mich., and Rockford, Ill.
Markets, including those in New York, Louisiana and Delaware, are new territories for Valpak and residents in these areas will receive the company’s blue envelope for the very first time, the company said.
About the company
Specializing in cooperative direct mail, Valpak mails more than 20 billion coupons to over 40 million demographically targeted households per month in more than 100 markets in 45 states and four Canadian provinces, according to a Valpak news release.
In addition to its blue envelope, the brand offers its business customers a portfolio of digital-advertising products including smartphone apps, which are also integrated into the Samsung Wallet, iOS Passbook, Google wallet and Windows phone wallet, along with and online coupons to reach consumers at home and elsewhere.
Launched in Clearwater, Fla. in 1968, Valpak operates a 470,000-square-foot manufacturing center in St. Petersburg, Fla., enabling the company to mail material to more than 500 million homes in North America, the firm said.
Cox Target Media, Inc. owns and operates Valpak with nearly 170 franchises across the U.S. and Canada that delivers coupons to nearly 40 million households each month, according to the website of Cox Target Media.
Annually, Valpak will distribute some 20 billion offers inserted in more than 500 million envelopes, the website says.
Cox Target Media is a subsidiary of Atlanta–based Cox Media Group, which is owned by Cox Enterprises, Inc., one of the largest media companies in the U.S. with holdings in newspaper, television, radio, cable and Internet/interactive industries.
Contact Reinhardt at ereinhardt@cnybj.com
Bonadio plots further growth as it moves up Top 100 list
SYRACUSE — The Bonadio Group, upstate New York’s largest independent CPA firm, recently ranked as the 50th largest tax and accounting firm in Accounting Today’s Top 100 Firms list. Bonadio, which ranked at number 55 in 2012, is the highest-ranking firm from upstate New York on the list, which recognizes the top revenue-producing firms from
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
SYRACUSE — The Bonadio Group, upstate New York’s largest independent CPA firm, recently ranked as the 50th largest tax and accounting firm in Accounting Today’s Top 100 Firms list.
Bonadio, which ranked at number 55 in 2012, is the highest-ranking firm from upstate New York on the list, which recognizes the top revenue-producing firms from among the nation’s 45,000 CPA firms. Accounting Today is a bi-weekly magazine for the accounting industry.
“We’re very proud to be on the Top 100 list coming from the markets we come from,” says Thomas Bonadio, CEO and managing partner. The Bonadio Group, headquartered in Rochester, does not have a significant presence in major markets like New York City, he says. Rather the firm is the big fish in a small pond, with offices in numerous mid-size markets across New York including a 10,000-square-foot office at 115 Solar St., Syracuse, where the firm has between 45 and 50 employees.
Accounting fees are traditionally lower in the markets Bonadio is located in, he says, which makes the company’s revenue achievement even more significant. On top of that, the markets are not ones that have seen a great deal of economic growth, he adds.
The Bonadio Group, on the other hand, has produced revenue growth. The firm’s projected revenue of $66.29 million for fiscal year 2014, which ends April 30, is well ahead of the revenue goal of $60 million it set in its last three-year strategic plan, which runs through next year.
Thomas Bonadio says he expects revenue in the $75 million to $80 million range for the coming fiscal year as it will include the three mergers Bonadio closed on this fiscal year. The firm is also generating internal growth.
“We’re not growing just through mergers,” he notes. “We’re up about 8 percent organically.” That growth comes from winning over new clients as well as doing additional work with existing clients, he notes.
The potential is out there for even more growth, Bonadio says, and he has his eye on two markets for the coming year. The Central New York/Syracuse area, as well as Manhattan, is on his radar for future growth.
“We won’t be happy until we’re the number one firm in Syracuse,” Bonadio says. The firm has a goal of reaching 100 employees at each of its offices, he says. That size gives the firm enough staff to find and focus on areas of expertise as well as provide the best level of service to clients.
One area of expertise the Syracuse office has honed is providing internal audit services to banks and credit unions. “That practice has been growing great guns,” Bonadio says, setting the Syracuse office apart as almost a sole provider of that service in New York. “No one else has the expertise.”
Mergers
While he declined to discuss any specific plans regarding mergers, Bonadio says the firm is in some stage of talks with potential merger in every market where Bonadio has an office. It would be surprising if the firm didn’t have news of a merger in the Syracuse area in the coming year, he says.
“The whole industry is in merger mania,” Bonadio says. Figures show there are 45,000 CPA firms in the nation today, but experts estimate that figure will drop to fewer than 20,000 over the next decade through mergers, retirements, and other changes. Many small firms, with owners looking to retire, are interested in joining forces with another firm that can keep the business going, Bonadio says. In addition, it’s becoming increasingly more difficult for smaller firms to successfully compete with their larger competitors, especially as clients require more and more specialized services instead of general accounting services.
With 11 offices and nearly 500 employees, The Bonadio Group (www.bonadio.com) serves more than 17,000 clients in New York and several other states. Founded in 1978, the firm provides accounting, business advisory, payroll, and personal financial services. Offices are located in Rochester, Buffalo, Syracuse, Albany, Geneva, Perry, Utica, New York City, and Rutland, Vt.
Contact The Business Journal at news@cnybj.com
N.Y. AG settles with MVP Health Care for wrongly denying mental-health benefits
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman on March 20 announced a settlement with Schenectady-based MVP Health Care after an investigation uncovered “widespread” violations of mental-health parity laws. The probe found the health insurer denied mental-health benefits to “thousands” of New Yorkers, Schneiderman’s office said in a news release. Schneiderman’s office estimates that more than 3,000
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman on March 20 announced a settlement with Schenectady-based MVP Health Care after an investigation uncovered “widespread” violations of mental-health parity laws.
The probe found the health insurer denied mental-health benefits to “thousands” of New Yorkers, Schneiderman’s office said in a news release.
Schneiderman’s office estimates that more than 3,000 MVP members may be eligible for reimbursement for denied claims, including for residential treatment, the news release said.
The settlement requires the health insurer to reform its review process for behavioral-health claims; cover residential treatment; and charge the lower primary-care co-payment for outpatient visits to most mental health and substance-abuse treatment providers, Schneiderman’s office said.
The settlement also requires MVP to submit previously denied mental health and substance-abuse treatment claims for independent review.
That review could mean MVP will return more than $6 million to its members, according to Schneiderman’s office.
MVP Health Care did not respond to requests for comment by press time.
MVP Health Care covers more than 44,000 members in Central New York. The figure is part of more than 500,000 members in a New York service area that also includes the Albany region and the Hudson Valley, the news release stated.
State lawmakers enacted New York’s mental-health parity law, known as Timothy’s Law, in 2006. It requires that insurers provide mental-health coverage at least equal to coverage provided for other health conditions, according to Schneiderman’s office.
Schneiderman’s health-care bureau conducted an investigation that found MVP Health Care, through its behavioral-health subcontractor, Value Options, issued 40 percent more denials of coverage in behavioral-health cases than in medical cases since at least 2011.
In one case, the investigation found that MVP repeatedly denied coverage for the treatment of a young woman with a “very serious history” of substance-abuse disorder, even though her providers had prescribed inpatient rehabilitation, residential, and outpatient treatment.
As a result, the woman’s family spent a “great deal of time on a long series of appeals,” and paid more than $150,000 out of pocket for her treatment, the office said.
Ensuring that New Yorkers have adequate access to mental health and substance-abuse treatment “should be a priority” for the state, Schneiderman said in the news release.
“Insurers must comply with the law to ensure that individuals with mental-health conditions are treated no differently than those with physical ailments and that they are getting what they pay for from insurers. With this settlement, MVP Health Care commits to greatly improving treatment services available to thousands of New Yorkers,” Schneiderman said.
Under the settlement, MVP Health Care has agreed to cover residential treatment for behavioral-health conditions, including eating and substance-abuse disorders. It has also designated $1.5 million for reimbursement of members’ past residential-treatment claims that had previously not been covered.
MVP Health Care has agreed to overhaul its claims-review process by removing visit limits for almost all behavioral-health services; classifying claims correctly so that it conducts reviews “expeditiously” and it affords members full appeal rights; and by removing the requirement that members “fail” outpatient substance-abuse treatment before receiving inpatient-rehabilitation treatment, according to Schneiderman’s office.
In addition, MVP will base the number of treatment days or visits approved on members’ needs instead of arbitrary limits; co-locate medical and behavioral-health claims review staff, which will facilitate the coordination of members’ care; ensure that letters denying behavioral-health claims are “accurate and specific,” so that members can exercise their appeal rights.
Additionally, it its claims-review overhaul, MVP will continue coverage of treatment, pending the completion of internal appeals, so that treatment is not interrupted, according to Schneiderman’s office.
MVP Health Care has also agreed to provide members with an independent review of claims or requests that were denied as not medically necessary from 2011 through present, which could result in more than $6 million in reimbursement to members.
The plan will also allow members to submit claims for reimbursement for residential-treatment services since 2011, which could result in MVP providing refunds of up to $1.5 million to members.
Under the settlement, MVP Health Care will also submit to monitoring and will pay $300,000 to Schneiderman’s office as a civil penalty, the office said.
The agreement with MVP is the second that Schneiderman’s office has reached so far this year and stems from a “broader, ongoing” investigation into health-insurance companies’ compliance with mental-health parity laws.
The office on Jan. 15 announced a similar settlement with Cigna Corp. (NYSE: CI).
Contact Reinhardt at ereinhardt@cnybj.com
Centolella, colleagues launch new business-law firm
SYRACUSE — Five attorneys, who were formally part of the Bousquet Holstein PLLC law firm in Syracuse, have formed their own firm. Centolella Lynn D’Elia & Temes LLC is now operating in a 4,000-square-foot temporary space on the 17th floor of Axa Tower I at 100 Madison St. in downtown Syracuse. The firm plans to
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
SYRACUSE — Five attorneys, who were formally part of the Bousquet Holstein PLLC law firm in Syracuse, have formed their own firm.
Centolella Lynn D’Elia & Temes LLC is now operating in a 4,000-square-foot temporary space on the 17th floor of Axa Tower I at 100 Madison St. in downtown Syracuse.
The firm plans to move into a permanent 4,000-square-foot space in the building’s 19th floor in early May.
The firm’s office opened for business on March 3.
The attorneys involved include Jason Centolella, who is the firm’s managing member. In addition, the attorneys include Kathleen Centolella, who is Jason’s wife; Tim Lynn, Anthony D’Elia, and David Temes.
All five attorneys are considered members of the LLC, but Centolella declined to disclose what percentage of the firm each attorney owns.
Jason Centolella spoke with The Central New York Business Journalon March 21.
Centolella describes all the LLC’s members as good friends, about the same age, and “very entrepreneurial.”
“Each one of us has always had the desire to try and go out on their own and start their own law firm, we decided now is the right time,” Centolella says.
The firm’s practice areas include general business or corporate law, health care, commercial real estate and litigation, financial restructuring, mergers and acquisitions, taxation, and economic-development incentives.
Centolella calls the Centolella Lynn D’Elia & Temes firm a “boutique” business-law firm. “We’re going to focus on business issues,” he says.
The firm’s clients include hospitals, medical practices, manufacturers, and businesses.
Besides the attorneys, the firm also employs two full-time legal assistants. As for any additional employees in the year ahead, the firm is taking a “wait and see approach,” says Centolella.
Some law firms are a “one stop shop,” with several attorneys and practice groups. But Centolella Lynn D’Elia & Temes isn’t organized that way.
“If we don’t do [handle a certain legal area], we will … work with the client to find the best person to handle that specific issue outside of the firm,” Centolella says.
Centolella practices in health-care law and general business, which includes mergers and acquisitions, general contracting, joint ventures, he says.
D’Elia focuses on commercial real-estate matters. David Temes is a creditors’ rights, bankruptcy, and commercial litigator, Centolella adds.
Tim Lynn is a business attorney, tax attorney, while Kathleen Centolella practices in the areas of tax, general business, and employee benefits.
The firm will provide clients access to its attorneys during evening hours, early morning, and weekends, according to Centolella.
“It’s become a 24-hour business. Issues come up at all hours of the day and clients want immediate response. That’s one of our principals. Always be responsive to the client,” he says.
The firm’s members have watched downtown Syracuse “transform” over the past five years, noting young entrepreneurs in technology that are taking chances and starting companies, Centolella says.
“We wanted to take that chance,” he added.
After discussing the possibility in the early weeks of this year, the five members informed Bousquet Holstein of their plans in late February and their previous employer “couldn’t have been more supportive,” Centolella says.
“We share mutual clients. We talk almost daily. We will continue to work like that. We will send work back and forth,” he adds.
Michael Durkin of CBD Brokerage in Syracuse helped Centolella find the new firm’s operating space in Axa Tower I.
“It’s open space. It’s kind of a shell,” he says.
CBD Construction is building it out into conference rooms, offices for the attorneys, a break room, file room.
Centolella declined to provide specific figures but indicated the firm has “projected revenue goals.”
“I feel confident that we can … meet those goals,” he says.
Contact Reinhardt at ereinhardt@cnybj.com
CPA addresses issues entrepreneurs face as startup business owners
SYRACUSE — A partner at Dannible & McKee, LLP on Jan. 31 spoke at the Syracuse Tech Garden, addressing entrepreneurs on issues they are facing in the startup phase of their businesses. Michael Reilly spoke on topics that included accounting impact in their choice of operating entity and the tax implication of knowing how to
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
SYRACUSE — A partner at Dannible & McKee, LLP on Jan. 31 spoke at the Syracuse Tech Garden, addressing entrepreneurs on issues they are facing in the startup phase of their businesses.
Michael Reilly spoke on topics that included accounting impact in their choice of operating entity and the tax implication of knowing how to classify their workers as either employees or independent contractors.
Attorneys from the Wladis Law Firm, P.C. joined Reilly for the presentation.
Reilly also spoke with The Central New York Business Journal in a follow-up conversation on March 21.
Choice of entity
Reilly addressed the accounting advantages and disadvantages of four types of business entities, including a sole proprietorship, a partnership, a corporation (either a C corporation, or an S corporation,) or a limited-liability company.
If someone starts a business as the sole owner, he/she can choose to form a sole proprietorship, and the accounting is “relatively easy,” Reilly says.
The owner can use the cash-basis method of accounting, depending on the business.
“All the information gets reported on their personal return, using a form Schedule C,” Reilly says.
However, the problem with a sole proprietorship, he notes, is the owner faces the potential for liability issues because the individual isn’t protected from the business because they are one and the same.
“For example, if the business got sued, you as the owner would also be involved in that lawsuit,” Reilly says.
He describes a partnership as an entity that is similar to a [sole] proprietorship, except that it has two or more owners.
The owners are required to file a separate partnership return, Form 1065, making it a “little bit more complicated,” and the liability issue remains, Reilly says.
If the partnership faces a lawsuit, each of the partners would be liable, he adds
Entrepreneurs concerned about liability could consider forming a corporation, according to Reilly.
He explained that one of the differences between a C corporation (a regular corporation) and an S corporation is that a C corporation pays its own taxes on all the income it earns.
“And then when those earnings are distributed, the shareholder would pay taxes on them again,” Reilly adds.
For example, if a person bought stock in Microsoft, the firm pays its own taxes and then the shareholder gets a dividend. The shareholder pays taxes on the earnings again in a regular C corporation. In an S corporation, however, all the earnings effectively flow through the owners, so the owners pay taxes on the earnings.
“So it’s a one-time tax,” Reilly says.
Forming an S corporation is similar to a partnership in terms of taxation, he says. In a partnership, the partners are taxed on all the earnings, and same process applies to an S corporation.
The difference between an S Corporation and a partnership are the limited-liability issues, Reilly says.
“If the corporation got sued … that entity would be sued but the individual shareholders would not be sued unless they were personally negligent … Therefore it gives [an entrepreneur] liability protection,” he adds.
And that’s the primary reason why an entrepreneur would choose to form a corporation, so whether you’re a C corporation or an S corporation, you’ve got limited liability.
The fourth possible type of entity is a limited-liability company (LLC), which is “kind of a hybrid,” he says.
“It’s really a partnership that’s got limited liability like a corporation,” he adds.
If a partnership faces a lawsuit, the individual partners are also liable. A lawsuit against an LLC can target its assets but not the individual members, which makes it similar to an S corporation.
Entrepreneurs like the partnership format, but they don’t like the liabilities involved, so that is why some choose the LLC option. LLCs provide corporate protection, but entrepreneurs are taxed in the same way as a partnership, Reilly says.
Employee or independent contractor
Reilly also discussed what qualifies a worker or service provider as an independent contractor rather than an employee, and the tax implications involved.
Business owners can use a 20-factor test that’s part of the IRS ruling 87-41, Reilly says.
The factors involve an employer’s control over the individual, he says.
If the owner controls when the person arrives for work, what tools the person uses to complete the job, and the space the person needs to execute the work, then that individual is under the company’s control.
“Then the IRS can come back and say … they’re an employee, not an independent contractor,” Reilly says.
The IRS could then reclassify that worker as an employee, if the owner was choosing, just arbitrarily, to treat the person as an independent contractor to avoid the payroll taxes, he adds.
At the same time, if that worker operates another business or works for someone else and the entrepreneur just needs a job completed, then the independent-contractor qualification will likely apply.
“We’re not going to control, direct, or supervise you. You just take care of it. In that case then, they’re going to be more in the nature of an independent contractor,” Reilly says.
Contact Reinhardt at ereinhardt@cnybj.com
Mark Twain said, “What is the difference between a taxidermist and a tax collector? The taxidermist takes only your skin“ and Barry Goldwater reflected, “The income tax created more criminals than any other single act of government.“ Einstein and Churchill had their own lowly views on the topic. While we may chuckle and agree with
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Mark Twain said, “What is the difference between a taxidermist and a tax collector? The taxidermist takes only your skin“ and Barry Goldwater reflected, “The income tax created more criminals than any other single act of government.“ Einstein and Churchill had their own lowly views on the topic. While we may chuckle and agree with the sentiments of these famous gentlemen, we can neither run from nor ignore the unsavory topic.
Perhaps more so than ever, the many facets of the U.S. tax system are a tough pill to swallow. For decades taxpayers have been grousing about the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). And while AMT remains an important consideration for understanding your income-tax liability, there is now a longer list of things to keep in mind.
Let’s take inventory of the current state of affairs — the regular tax along with new tax brackets, the alternative minimum tax, and the net investment-income tax. Each holds a myriad of details. Read on for a primer on what each may mean to you.
The regular tax now has seven brackets ranging from 10 percent to a maximum of 39.6 percent. Essentially, this means both a higher maximum rate as well as numerous increments to consider. Many taxpayers in the lowest brackets are living at roughly the poverty level. Other taxpayers are impacted by both tax bracket as well as personal exemption phase out and limitations on itemized deductions. The impact will be felt by individuals with adjusted gross income as low as $150,000 for married taxpayers filing separately. Those filing single will see the effect at $250,000 and the threshold is $300,000 for those married filing jointly.
AMT consideration begins at modest income levels and includes various phase-outs, add backs and limitations as well as interplay with maximum capital-gains rates in certain situations. Suffice to say, complications abound when it comes to AMT.
As for capital-gains rates, there are three to consider (ranging from 0 percent to 20 percent) plus special rates for depreciation recapture and gain on collectibles.
The highly publicized net investment-income tax is a boot in the pants not just for individuals with net investment income, but for taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income in excess of $250,000 for married taxpayers filing jointly ($125,000 if filing separate) and $200,000 for other taxpayers. Many individuals are surprised when they see the impact of the tax even though they have little or no gross investment income. On the positive side of the equation is the allowability of certain deductions from gross investment income including investment interest expense and certain investment-related fees.
While it is important to understand how your current tax liability is being calculated, a forward-looking perspective is critical in terms of timing of income and deductions. Did you know, for example, that a ROTH distribution does not increase either net investment income or modified adjusted gross income but distributions from traditional IRAs do increase modified adjusted gross income? Clearly, as you work to maximize what you keep after taxes, future tax brackets are extremely important as is the type of income.
All this consideration requires a bit of diligent homework. What is a taxpayer to do? Consult with your CPA to get a clear picture of how all the details apply to your tax situation now, and into the future.
Gail Kinsella is a partner in the accounting firm of Testone, Marshall & Discenza, LLP in Syracuse. Contact Kinsella at gkinsella@tmdcpas.com
Raising Capital Via Crowdfunding: A Step Closer to Reality
The JOBS Act (short for Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act) became law in April 2012. One of the more controversial provisions in the JOBS Act was the creation of a new “crowdfunding” exemption from federal and state securities-law registration available for startup and early stage businesses seeking to raise capital. Crowdfunding is the name given
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
The JOBS Act (short for Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act) became law in April 2012. One of the more controversial provisions in the JOBS Act was the creation of a new “crowdfunding” exemption from federal and state securities-law registration available for startup and early stage businesses seeking to raise capital.
Crowdfunding is the name given to raising money via the Internet. Someone raising funds through crowdfunding typically seeks small amounts from a large number of individuals. Crowdfunding existed prior to the JOBS Act, but the funds typically came in the form of donations — either to support a cause or an artistic endeavor without any expectation of a financial return from the donation. Sometimes the contributor received a token gift for his or her contribution, such as a product sample.
In the United States, crowdfunding has not been used by businesses to raise capital from individual investors because of limitations imposed by federal and state securities laws. Offering someone an ownership interest in a company in exchange for an investment involves the sale of a “security,” and current law does not allow the solicitation of equity capital from the public-at-large via the Internet without going through the process of fully registering the offering with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC). The JOBS Act crowdfunding provisions set out to change that by allowing businesses to raise capital using Web-crowdfunding techniques. The goal was to facilitate the raising of capital by making relatively low-dollar offerings of securities less costly.
The crowdfunding exemption created by the JOBS Act allows companies to seek small investments from an unlimited number of investors, subject to certain conditions imposed by Congress. Those conditions include:
The crowdfunding provisions of the JOBS Act are not self-implementing. Congress directed the SEC to adopt regulations implementing the crowdfunding exemption within 270 days of enactment of the JOBS Act. That deadline came and went, but on Oct. 23, 2013, the SEC issued a proposed “Regulation Crowdfunding.” The regulation is more than 50 pages long and is contained in a release totaling 585 pages. The proposed regulation expands on some of the requirements included in the JOBS Act and adds several new requirements not included in the JOBS Act pursuant to authority delegated by Congress to the SEC to promulgate regulations implementing the Act.
The public disclosure of business and financial information about a company selling securities is a fundamental component of the current regulatory scheme governing securities offerings, so it comes as no surprise that Congress and the SEC require the disclosure of specific information.
Within the JOBS Act itself, Congress required companies raising money through crowdfunding to disclose information such as the names and addresses of the company’s officers, directors, and 20 percent shareholders, and a description of the business or anticipated business of the company. The SEC, in its Regulation Crowdfunding, requires the following additional information be disclosed: (a) the business experience of officers and directors, (b) the compensation being paid to intermediaries for the offering, (c) the number of employees, (d) risk factors, (e) material indebtedness, and (f) related party transactions.
Congress also mandated in the JOBS Act that specific financial information be provided to potential investors. Companies raising less than $100,000 must disclose their most recent tax return and provide financial statements certified by the CEO. Businesses raising between $100,000 and $500,000 must provide financial statements reviewed by an outside CPA firm. Companies raising more than $500,000 must provide financial statements audited by an outside CPA firm.
In its Regulation Crowdfunding, the SEC added the requirement that companies must also provide a narrative discussion of its financial condition, including a narrative discussion of its historical financial results (if it has an operating history), liquidity, and capital resources. The SEC also specified that, for offerings in excess of $100,000, the financial statements must consist of a balance sheet, income statement, cash-flow statement, and statement of changes in owners’ equity for the past two years. In order to facilitate the disclosure of information required by the JOBS Act and its regulation, the SEC proposed a new Form C on which a company may supply the required information.
In its release announcing the proposed Regulation Crowdfunding, the SEC said it was mindful of the costs of complying with the crowdfunding requirements and sought to strike a balance between making crowdfunding affordable for small businesses and protecting the interests of investors. The SEC estimated that the upfront costs of complying with the crowdfunding requirements were between $13,500 and $18,500 for an offering of less than $100,000; between $40,500 and $70,500 for an offering of more than $100,000 but less than $500,000; and between $77,250 and $152,250 for an offering exceeding $500,000.
The bulk of these estimated costs are for compensation payable to the broker-dealer or funding portal managing the offering and for fees payable to CPAs for obtaining reviewed or audited financial statements as required for offerings in excess of $100,000.
The SEC invited public comments on its proposed Regulation Crowdfunding. In its release announcing the new Regulation Crowdfunding, the SEC identified about 300 specific issues on which it solicited comments. Public comments were due in early February. Until the SEC issues Regulation Crowdfunding in its final form and it becomes effective, companies may not utilize the crowdfunding exemption contained in the JOBS Act to raise capital.
Ronald C. Berger is a business and corporate attorney at Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC. Contact him at (315) 218-8216 or rberger@bsk.com
Michael Rotella: A Shining Example of the Entrepreneurial Spirit in Upstate N.Y.
As entrepreneurship flourishes in upstate New York, more examples of success are popping up on the landscape. Achievement comes in many forms and is made up of many different ingredients. However, perseverance is a common theme among successful entrepreneurs. They never give up and they find a way to succeed no matter the obstacles. Michael
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
As entrepreneurship flourishes in upstate New York, more examples of success are popping up on the landscape. Achievement comes in many forms and is made up of many different ingredients. However, perseverance is a common theme among successful entrepreneurs. They never give up and they find a way to succeed no matter the obstacles.
Michael Rotella, an upstate New York entrepreneur, is a great example of the start-up scene and epitomizes the word “perseverance.” We thought Rotella’s story was so intriguing, we asked him to tell it in the first person. Here is his story of entrepreneurial determination and success.
Rotella tells his story
My name is Michael Rotella and I’m the founder of SyracuseGuru.com. We’re an independent media site founded in June 2011 that is the authority on the best things to do in Syracuse. We are the ultimate lifestyle guide to Central New York, covering food, concerts, arts, theatre, and more. The website has grown to be a strong, recognizable brand and one that is on a constant upward trajectory. I’ve personally invested almost three years of tireless work into Guru and we’re now in the process of monetizing the site’s growing traffic and expanding the organization.
Many people I talk to seem confused when I tell them that, yes, I personally run the entire operation. Others have reached out to me with words of encouragement and/or gratitude, saying things like, “Thanks for making Syracuse cool again.” I’ve never liked to call myself an entrepreneur but the more work I do the more I understand exactly what that word means. I’ve also learned how one goes about being an entrepreneur in Syracuse. All of this while technically being a Whitman School of Management Entrepreneurship and Emerging Enterprises (EEE) dropout.
I could say that we don’t have substantial access to investment capital, we don’t keep our talent here, and New York state taxes aren’t exactly new-venture friendly. I could name about 10 other things that make Syracuse a horrible place to do business. But, I’d be missing a key point if I said all that. The fact is that Syracuse is the perfect place to do business. Our isolation from national trends means we, as entrepreneurs or just creative thinkers, have the ultimate environment for innovation. Organizations such as the Syracuse Technology Garden, Start Fast Venture Accelerator, and Terakeet have taught us that innovation does happen locally and often on a grand scale.
We have so many “old” or traditional industries here that allow a relatively simple concept like Guru to be truly disruptive. Do some Google searches on local event-related terms and you’ll see what I’m talking about. So what do you think CNY lacks? Do you have the talent or more important, the personal drive to fill that gap? Well, what are you waiting for? Syracuse is your personal innovation sandbox. Start playing.
With my venture, I have enjoyed a degree of luck before I even started and I credit part of my so-called success to that. I went into my venture with one of the area’s most talented graphic designers as a family member, I graduated from likely one of the best and most underrated programs at Syracuse University, I have experience with search-engine optimization, and those I previously had as friends became mentors and advisers when I stumbled upon and took action on my sudden vision. But, not all my luck has been good in the traditional sense. I have also suffered major setbacks in my constant pursuit of progress —a serious disability for one.
Beyond the normal difficulties of business, I also have to deal with the additional issues of having muscular dystrophy. This pretty much means I can’t work a normal 9 to 5 schedule, require special accommodations for office space, special equipment for my vehicle, and much more. I also have to improvise in social situations and while networking. When people first meet me there’s potential that they might be extra surprised with my achievements. “Oh, you’re the Guru?.” or similar remarks reflect this. Concern with going to pitch an ad contract and showing up on a mobility scooter is a major hurdle, make no mistake about that. “What will they think of me?” and similar sentiments do not belong in the entrepreneur’s mindset and this is something I still battle. In business and personal life, disability can be an absolute hell, but it’s being an entrepreneur and demanding that respect that has taught me how to handle the negativity. My life is an extension of the venture I started and vice versa. Letting anything come between my goals in business and what I love to do is something I find unacceptable.
Now how does someone with my unique set of gifts and often-profound issues like disability succeed at a venture? Surely, if I can do it, then 10, 20, 50, maybe even 100 other young people can decide to stay in Syracuse and single-mindedly hustle like all the other local entrepreneurs and I do. We all have our immovable hurdles, and it’s up to us to be clever enough to get around them — that’s the definition of innovation, isn’t it?
I’m not saying this is all you need, but I think I have a few things figured out. Entrepreneurship is less about specifics and more about a mindset. Each person has a different goal and passion, but some principles hold true across the spectrum.
1. Have and follow a strict vision — Syracuse Guru was a simple concept that just hit me. Within the first few days, I fleshed it out into an entire vision. Before I wrote my first article, I envisioned where I am today. Now, I envision where I will be in another three years. This is key. I always say that belief is three-quarters of success — action being the final step. Belief in your mission and product is up there, but belief in yourself is number one. Can I — by myself —create and run the best media source in Central New York from nothing? Do I believe in my own vision? I said yes.
2. Never give up — This age-old cliché is the most powerful thing you can harness. The stubbornness to stick to a vision, to see it through, and to make your life and work one in the same means more than you can imagine. This is what I do every single day. It’s what you have to do. Be stubborn and fight for the right to make your own mistakes. Don’t take too much advice. You will know if it’s actually time to throw in the towel, but a real entrepreneur does not just stop. He or she moves on but keeps this attitude in reserve for the next venture.
3. Network — Networking isn’t something you do at a sanctioned “networking event.” That notion is completely wrong. Networking is something you do every single day of the week. Networking is making friends and it’s as simple as being social on your way through life. As I said, your friends often turn into huge supporters and even mentors once you launch a venture. Networking is doing favors more than asking for them. It’s setting up constant meetings to brainstorm about how you might work together. Think of networking as a lifestyle. Something you just do. Don’t confuse real networking with clicking, “Add Connection” on LinkedIn.
I’ll add that even though I have these words of wisdom for you, almost my entire existence is based upon uncertainty. As I’ve mention above I have a disability, which has a major effect on my life. Often skewed self-perception, living-arrangement issues, struggles with my peer group, uncertainty about the future, and worst of all—fear. These things come with my situation. I am not going to be clichéd and say what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger but I do believe that character is measured by how each of us grapples with our realities. You can give up or you can embrace everything good and bad and never slow down. A few years ago, I chose to demand more of myself and create my own momentum.
I often wonder where I would be without them but I know that these challenges are where Guru came from. My personal history is one of adapting amidst fear and uncertainty. So in a way, disability taught me everything I know about entrepreneurship. It’s not as simple as the “if I can do it then anyone can” narrative. What I will say is that you must intensely learn from difficulties no matter what they may be — no matter their severity. Take your biggest struggles and divert the frustration into creating a venture and building something real for yourself in Syracuse. That’s what I’ve done and it’s imbued all my efforts with a strength and drive I previously thought impossible.
For more information about Rotella, please visit www.syracuseguru.com. Contact him directly at mike@syracuseguru.com.
Robert M. (Rob) Simpson is president and CEO of CenterState CEO. Contact him via email at: rsimpson@centerstateceo.com. Kyle Blumin is a serial entrepreneur, with multiple business exits, based in upstate New York. He is passionate about driving personal and professional success through entrepreneurship. You can follow Blumin on Twitter @KyleBlumin.
Outlining the Priorities for a Final State Budget
As New York legislative leaders representing both the Assembly and Senate discuss and debate their goals for the upcoming state spending plan, with an April 1 deadline looming, a number of ideas have been put on the table. I recently urged my legislative colleagues to consider the following items that have statewide ramifications. Final budget
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
As New York legislative leaders representing both the Assembly and Senate discuss and debate their goals for the upcoming state spending plan, with an April 1 deadline looming, a number of ideas have been put on the table. I recently urged my legislative colleagues to consider the following items that have statewide ramifications.
Final budget needs to be responsible
First and foremost, the final state-budget agreement needs to reflect the interests of 19 million New Yorkers — not simply what might fit the political agenda of the newly elected mayor of New York City. Since January, the financial and legislative wish-lists of Mayor Bill de Blasio have received a great deal of attention, from both media and Albany lawmakers. But as statewide representatives, we need to be responsible to all New Yorkers. To do so, budget discussions should keep these priorities in mind:
As we approach the April 1 budget deadline, I will continue to fight for common-sense programs and a responsible state spending plan — one that represents the taxpaying public rather than personal politics.
Brian M. Kolb (R,I,C–Canandaigua) is the New York Assembly Minority Leader and represents the 131st Assembly District, which encompasses all of Ontario County and parts of Seneca County. Contact him at kolbb@assembly.state.ny.us
Stay up-to-date on the companies, people and issues that impact businesses in Syracuse, Central New York and beyond.