Stay up-to-date on the companies, people and issues that impact businesses in Syracuse, Central New York and beyond.
The Rewards of Employing Individuals With Disabilities
Far and away the best prize that life has to offer is the chance to work hard at work worth doing. — Theodore Roosevelt “You do realize that each of us has some form of disability or flaw? No one is perfect.” I responded with my standard quote, “It’s just that certain disabilities are more […]
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
[bypass-paywall-buynow-link link_text=”Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article”].
Far and away the best prize that life has to offer is the chance to work hard at work worth doing. — Theodore Roosevelt
“You do realize that each of us has some form of disability or flaw? No one is perfect.”
I responded with my standard quote, “It’s just that certain disabilities are more visible than others.”
This brief interchange has occurred dozens of times during my career in serving and supporting tax-exempt disability service providers. A recent repeat of this interchange prompts the topic for this column. That is, meaningful employment of individuals with disabilities.
The federal government, as a result of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Supreme Court decision known as Olmstead, is on a mission. Individuals with disabilities are guaranteed by law, supported by the Supreme Court, to receive services and be involved in all activities (residential, employment, transportation, etc.) in the most integrated, least restrictive setting appropriate for their needs and abilities. Conceptually, I think we can all agree that this is good public policy. However, the ramifications of implementing these requirements are causing tremendous anxiety and disruption to individuals with disabilities, particularly in the area of integrated employment opportunities.
By way of background, in July 2013, the federal government through the Center for Medicare Services (CMS) effectively began the termination of more than 10,000 individuals with disabilities who have been employed in a workshop setting, in some cases for more than five decades. In January 2014, the federal Department of Justice settled a consent decree with the state of Rhode Island that is resulting in a similar termination of more than 2,500 individuals with disabilities who have been meaningfully employed in that state’s workshops.
While we can all agree that integrated community-based employment opportunities are desirable for every one with disabilities, the fact is that not every individual with disabilities can be successful in an integrated employment workplace.
Success stories
Before I provide specific recommendations regarding employing individuals with disabilities, here are some real-world success stories. Only the names have been changed to protect their identities.
So let me tell you about Bill, Carol, and Roger. After reading their stories, I am hopeful that you will begin to look for opportunities to employ individuals with disabilities. They most certainly deserve that opportunity.
Bill, known to his friends as “Wild Bill,” is a gregarious, fun-loving individual who happened to be born with a serious case of cerebral palsy. Bill was able to stay at home with his loving parents and his seven siblings for his first 40 years. He now lives in a group home in upstate New York. Bill and I are good friends and we go to movies, bowling, and various sporting events together.
Bill’s parents owned a sawmill and lumber yard. Bill is very proud that, at age 14, under the supervision of his father and brothers, he was able to operate the “barker” machine. The barker, I learned, removed the bark from the trees after they arrived at the saw mill. Now, some 40 years later, Bill works multiple jobs, including volunteering at the Salvation Army, stocking shelves at the Coalition Grocery store, and serving on a janitorial cleaning crew.
Bill shares a common attribute with almost all other individuals with disabilities. That is, they want to work and be productive at anything they are capable of doing.
Carol works as a receptionist and administrative assistant in our Geneva, N.Y. office. She assists our office manager and has done so faithfully for the past seven years. Carol has been a breath of fresh air, with her caring personality and her candy contributions. In her ongoing attempts to change the “dull and boring” stereotype of the accountant she works with, both she and he have benefitted immensely from her work effort. She is truly one of us, which is what integrated work opportunities are all about.
Finally, here is the amazing story of Roger, who works as an IT consultant for our firm. You see, Roger was born deaf and without ears. His parents were told, while he was still in the hospital, that “you might be better off putting him in an institution; he will be a burden on your lives and society.” Roger grew up painfully shy because of his disability. However, his parents were both outraged by the advice provided and determined to make sure that Roger lived a “normal” life. In Roger’s view, his parents, through their determination, saved him from a life of “being disabled.”
At a young age, Roger was fortunate to be fitted with a hearing device. During his youth and early adulthood, he was able to serve as a lifeguard, camp counselor, disc jockey, and audio-visual director. As he told me recently, “Who would think that a guy without ears would do any of those listening-intensive jobs?” And, in a note of irony, Roger likes to quote the social worker who said jokingly, “Gee, for a guy without ears, you sure do listen well.”
Roger, as an adult, is married with children and remains actively involved in a number of organizations supporting both deaf individuals and others with disabilities. My favorite quote from Roger is one that applies to all individuals with disabilities. His personal mantra is “if you surround yourself with coconuts, you become a coconut.” To be clear, his position is that he would have become developmentally disabled by being treated as developmentally disabled.
So there you have three of literally hundreds of similar stories that I have heard and observed over my 40-year career. Individuals with disabilities truly want “a hand up, not a handout.” And the best thing that you could provide to them, and what they want most of all, is meaningful employment. As with all of us, it gives our life purpose, meaning, and satisfaction.
I hope that I have tugged at your heartstrings. But individuals with disabilities don’t want your sympathy, they want the following:
Enough said on this topic. Now it is time for each of us to be responsible in our response to the need and in our actions.
Gerald J. Archibald, CPA, is a partner in charge of the management advisory services at The Bonadio Group. Contact him at (585) 381-1000, or email: garchibald@bonadio.com
The Leader’s Role in Implementing Strategy
Leadership is critical to successful strategy implementation and execution. In my work with CEOs, I’ve found that leaders often appreciate tips and techniques on how they can best lead a new strategy. Here are 10 of the most important leadership factors to lead a strategy implementation and ensure its success. Take the leadBe visible. Communicate
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
[bypass-paywall-buynow-link link_text=”Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article”].
Leadership is critical to successful strategy implementation and execution. In my work with CEOs, I’ve found that leaders often appreciate tips and techniques on how they can best lead a new strategy. Here are 10 of the most important leadership factors to lead a strategy implementation and ensure its success.
Take the lead
Be visible. Communicate all the time, both formally (presentations, intranet, etc.) and informally (when you’re meeting with employees.) The most effective leaders are continually talking about the strategy, providing insights about what the big picture is, and using the strategy to make decisions. When you implement a strategy, you are taking your organization into the future, so give your people a very clear picture of where you are headed, get people to buy in and change how the organization thinks about itself. Employees want to hear strategy directly from the top. I’ve seen CEOs of Fortune 500 companies and leading professional firms talk with small groups about strategy; it has a very strong impact. Projects and timelines are critically important, but don’t confuse those with leadership.
Prioritize
Strategy is about making choices about what you will do, and equally important, what you won’t do. If you’re trying to be world-class in everything, then it’s highly likely that you don’t have a god strategy to begin with. Focus on the few most important initiatives and drive them forward a mile instead of trying to move everything forward an inch.
Build strong buy-in among your top team
Heads nodding in agreement during a strategy session are not a measure of buy-in. You need every senior leader to be strongly advancing the strategy by publicly (and privately) supporting it, and by demonstrating support through their actions and behaviors: How they communicate and make decisions. This is the number one reason why strategies don’t get implemented successfully.
I was retained by a gas and electric utility to help them understand and overcome employee resistance to a major organizational change. Here’s what the problem was: Members of the senior leadership team, all of whom supported the change, were directing their people to tackle immediate needs within their functional organizations before working on the change. To employees, that meant that the major change wasn’t a priority, so they resisted it.
Allocate resources to achieve the strategy
Similar to the previous factor, make sure the key strategic initiatives are adequately staffed and given the appropriate resources to get the job done. If you don’t, the strategy will go on the back burner or be seen as an add-on to everyday tasks.
Objectively assess the skills needed
You have to be very tough on this one. If the skills aren’t there, you need to take action to correct it, or change the strategy. A consumer-goods manufacturer I worked with formulated a strategy that called for a continual stream of new products. That required top-notch product development — beyond the capability of the current organization.
Don’t underestimate the importance of implementation skills
There are effective and ineffective ways to drive change in organizations. You want an organization that embraces change and is eager to make it happen. But all too often, change is ineffective and the result is short-term and superficial with an alienated workforce. You’ve got to have the right implementation skills, and they are not normally found within most organizations. This is the number two reason why strategies don’t get implemented successfully.
Make the strategic tactical
Drive strategies down to individual performance objectives and decision-making. Foster both accountability and transparency. You want everyone accountable for their part in achieving strategic objectives, and you want everyone to know how well they are doing. This usually means that jobs will have to change to reflect the strategy. If you have a new strategy, and people’s jobs don’t change, or if the strategic tasks are additional work, something is wrong with the implementation.
Strategic focus
Keep its attention on achieving strategic objectives and head-off the tangents and diversions that are all too alluring to organizations. Functional groups are constantly coming up with their own projects that may meet their own agendas, but which distract from the strong focus on the strategy. It’s up to the leaders to watch for this and head it off, even if it feels like “Whack-a-Mole” at times.
Be personally involved in moving forward the few most important strategic initiatives
Not running them. And certainly not micro-managing them. But making sure that everyone knows which initiatives are most important and that you are closely watching the progress.
Engage the organization
Both intellectually and emotionally. Slide presentations about strategy rarely connect. A good story will.
Robert Legge is president of Legge & Company LLC, based in Lyons in Wayne County. He assists organizations to significantly improve outcomes with changes to strategy implementation, leadership, and organizational focus. His clients have included United Airlines, Paychex, Rich Products, the American Hospitals Association, and the Rochester-Genesee Valley Regional Transit Authority. Contact Legge at boblegge@boblegge.com
President further inflates the student-loan bubble
Just how big is the student-loan bubble? America’s college and university students now owe more than $1.2 trillion for their education, more than double the amount owed in 2007. The obligation impacts 37 million borrowers. The size of the debt is staggering, but of even more concern is the rate of expansion of the trend
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
[bypass-paywall-buynow-link link_text=”Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article”].
Just how big is the student-loan bubble?
America’s college and university students now owe more than $1.2 trillion for their education, more than double the amount owed in 2007. The obligation impacts 37 million borrowers. The size of the debt is staggering, but of even more concern is the rate of expansion of the trend and the concomitant rate of default. In just the last dozen years, the total amount borrowed annually has rocketed from $65.2 billion to $110.3 billion. The number of individuals with federally subsidized and unsubsidized loans has increased by almost 70 percent during the same period. During the recent recession, student debt was the only debt to increase. Today, 5.4 million borrowers are in default, a 15 percent rate. The Congressional Budget Office projects that the federal loan program will cost taxpayers $95 billion over the next decade.
The origins of the crisis began with Sputnik, a satellite the Soviets launched into space. Afraid that America was losing its competitive position, Congress passed the National Education Defense Act in 1958, which set up the first, federal student-loan program. The law created loan-insurance funds at universities to attract students pursuing a post-secondary education in science, math, and foreign languages. To qualify, students needed excellent grades, ability and/or preparation in a relevant field, and an interest in teaching.
Limits on the program were lifted during President Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society agenda. Suddenly, all students with any interest were eligible. The new law created the Guaranteed Student Loan Program (now known as the Stafford Loan program), which granted the government the right to pay part of the interest on private student loans and capped the interest rates. In every decade thereafter, Congress expanded the program further, and in 2010, squeezed out the private-lender market, replacing it by making direct loans to students rather than just insuring them.
Throwing more money at it
President Barack Obama’s answer to the impending implosion of the federal student-loan programs is to throw more money at the problem — taxpayer money. With the stroke of his pen on June 9, he signed an executive memorandum that expanded the already generous terms of “pay-as-you-earn,” an option that limits monthly student-loan repayments to a borrower’s discretionary income. (Discretionary income is computed by subtracting the poverty line that corresponds to your family size and the state in which you live from your adjusted gross income.)
Our president lowered the repayment cap from 15 percent to 10 percent. The program includes loan forgiveness after 20 years if you work in the private sector and 10 years if you work for government or for a nonprofit corporation. With the stroke of his pen, our chief executive has shifted still more of the financial burden off the direct beneficiary of the largesse and onto the hapless taxpayer. How much burden? Secretary of Education Arne Duncan said that the administration doesn’t yet know how much the expanded payment cap will cost. “We’ll figure it out on the back end,” he said. Now, that’s reassuring.
His actions, however, do nothing to address the heart of the problem — the rising tuition cost of our colleges and universities. For at least three decades, the cost has risen, on average, 6 percent — or three times the rate of inflation. The driver is the very federal programs designed to help students attend institutions of higher education. Universal loan programs increase the number of people who can pay the tuition along with the supply of money available. As Judah Bellin points out in the spring 2014 edition of National Affairs, schools can continually raise their tuition because federal aid is tied directly to the cost of attendance at an individual school.
Bellin explains: To receive aid, a college first determines the total cost to attend. After computing a student’s contribution, which is determined by a Congressional formula, the college then calculates the aid a student can receive. After adding up all of the student aid available, the institution makes a request to the federal government, with no limit on the amount requested, as long as it doesn’t exceed the mandated formula for eligibility. Bottom line: the federal, student-loan program is an individually tailored subsidy for colleges and universities.
I recognize that our presidents and successive Congresses can’t resist expanding every federal program, especially one supporting education. They are largely oblivious to the law of unintended consequences, focusing only on the “noble” goal and perhaps knowing that the inevitable fallout will be someone else’s crisis. But I also have to take students and their parents to task for being sucked in by the lure of easy money. The dilemma is wrapped up in a few statistics: 75 percent of Americans think college is too expensive, 57 percent don’t think there is an adequate return on the investment, yet 94 percent of parents expect their kids to attend college. Go figure!
There are a number of answers to the problem of skyrocketing post-secondary education, including phasing out the government’s loan program, capping the federal commitment, instituting performance standards for student eligibility, introducing more technology into teaching to help drive productivity improvement, cutting administrative bloat, and using private-equity funds, to name a few. This would also be a good time to re-examine the idea that everybody should go to college and rethink our vocational-education track to provide industry with trained workers. Above all else, disconnect the current loan programs from the college administrators who set the tuition rates and light a fire under the parents and students to act like consumers. Stop shielding them from the marketplace.
College is an opportunity; it is not a right. The current system of funding student loans is unsustainable. Today, 45 percent of recent graduates either can’t find jobs or have jobs that don’t require a college degree. There are plenty of ways to fix this problem. The only thing lacking is the will.
Norman Poltenson is a regional staff writer and publisher emeritus with The Business Journal News Network. Contact him at npoltenson@cnybj.com
WAER-FM to expand daily news and information programming
SYRACUSE — WAER FM 88.3 announced it will change its daily programming schedule on June 30, in response to research that “shows an increased demand
TERACAI has hired David Hettrick as a market development manager. Prior to joining TERACAI, he held roles as a data center network engineer and a
Annese & Associates, Inc. has promoted Melissa Bennett from financial services representative to financial services associate manager. She is responsible for reviewing and processing corporate expenses
Lorenzo Mansion state historic site to reopen for tours on July 18
CAZENOVIA — Guided tours of the Lorenzo Mansion in Cazenovia are scheduled to resume on July 18, following the installation of a new heating, ventilation,
MariRae Dopke, licensed associate real-estate broker, has re-joined HUNT Real Estate ERA’s Cicero Branch as broker consultant. Most recently, she led HUNT’s Liverpool branch as
Smith Sovik Kendrick & Sugnet announced that Victor L. Prial has joined the firm as an associate. He earned his law degree from the Syracuse
Kara A. Ladd has been named client advocate on the professional staff of Gilroy Kernan & Gilroy Inc. (GKG) of New Hartford. She is a
Stay up-to-date on the companies, people and issues that impact businesses in Syracuse, Central New York and beyond.