Stay up-to-date on the companies, people and issues that impact businesses in Syracuse, Central New York and beyond.
Griffiss utility launches plant retrofit project
ROME — A $20 million project to retrofit Griffiss Utility Services Corporation’s (GUSC) steam plant to burn wood chips in addition to its current natural gas and oil options should result in big savings for the utility provider and the Griffiss Business and Technology Park tenants it services, the utility says. GUSC Energy, Inc., a […]
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
ROME — A $20 million project to retrofit Griffiss Utility Services Corporation’s (GUSC) steam plant to burn wood chips in addition to its current natural gas and oil options should result in big savings for the utility provider and the Griffiss Business and Technology Park tenants it services, the utility says.
GUSC Energy, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of GUSC, began construction in early August and hopes to have the retrofitted plant online in the fall of 2013. Once complete, the plant will have the flexibility to use the most economical option between wood, natural gas, or oil as a fuel source, says Daniel Maneen, president and CEO of GUSC.
While the project began in earnest early this year with planning and site preparation, Maneen says it has truly been in the
works for the 12 years he has headed up GUSC. Shortly after he joined GUSC in January 2001, natural gas went from its historically low prices of about $2 or $3 a dekatherm to about $10 a dekatherm at a time when GUSC did not have any natural-gas contract with which to lock in prices, he says.
“That’s when it occurred to me that we need to have a little more control over our destiny as far as fuel goes,” Maneen says. GUSC provides energy services and steam heat to tenants in the business park through 26 miles of steam pipe and more than 100 miles of electrical distribution cable.
Maneen began the process of looking for alternative fuel sources, preferably ones that were locally sourced, and settled on wood as the ideal option. Not only is wood a sulfur-free, renewable fuel, but it’s also plentiful in the region, he says. To ensure the GUSC plant’s needs wouldn’t interfere with local business needs for wood, the project was designed around using waste wood products such as tree tops that loggers don’t use for lumber and other wood scraps. Those scraps are chipped and then ready to burn at the plant, Maneen says.
The change should give GUSC the ability to better plan its fuel costs as it can easily switch between the three fuel options depending on which one is least expensive, Maneen says. Those savings will pass directly to park tenants, who will see savings on their steam-heating costs of as much as 10 percent to 20 percent, he says. Park tenants already save about 20 percent to 30 percent over utility costs outside the park, Maneen notes.
GUSC is investing about $8 million of its own money in the project and financing the remaining $12 million through Oneida Savings Bank. The Mohawk Valley Regional Economic Development Council awarded the project a $1.5 million grant, which Maneen says GUSC will use to shorten the term of its loan.
Bette & Cring Construction Group of Albany is the lead contractor on the project. Incorporated in 2002, Griffiss Utility Services Corporation (www.gusc.net) is a nonprofit utility regulated by the New York State Public Service Commission. GUSC employs 16 people and uses the existing infrastructure at Griffiss Business and Technology Park to provide the lowest cost utilities to tenants. Current park tenants include the Air Force Research Laboratory, Defense Finance Accounting Services, Griffiss International Airport, Cathedral Corporation, Rome Free Academy, Oneida Financial Corporation, and Assured Information Services.
Do you really know what your IT department is doing?
How do you know that the decisions your information-technology (IT) department makes and actions it takes are in the best interest of your business. Are
Business Community is Vital to Area College Students
Calling all businesses in the Mohawk Valley region. It’s time to prepare for another transformation as more than 25,000 college students are set to return
Why Small Business is Big in Politics
It seems like Washington can’t agree on anything these days, except maybe one thing: small business. It seems everyone in Washington loves small business, or
North Country manufacturer’s 110 years of growth, change hasn’t yet hit a Climax
In January 1902, Michigan played Stanford at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena, Calif. It was the first college bowl game. In April, Leon Serpollet set a new car land-speed record of 75.06 miles-per-hour. In August, Teddy Roosevelt was the first U.S. president to ride in an automobile. That same year, Samuel L. Hirschey founded the
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
In January 1902, Michigan played Stanford at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena, Calif. It was the first college bowl game. In April, Leon Serpollet set a new car land-speed record of 75.06 miles-per-hour. In August, Teddy Roosevelt was the first U.S. president to ride in an automobile.
That same year, Samuel L. Hirschey founded the Climax Incubator and Brooder Company in Castorland, N.Y. Hirschey had a patent on an incubator designed for the hatching of chickens, but soon found himself manufacturing cheese drums for local dairy producers and for florists throughout the Northeast. By 1904, when he incorporated Climax Manufacturing Co., the demand for packaging products outstripped the demand for hatching chickens.
Thus began the story of a North Country business, which today is a world-class manufacturer of folding cartons and recycled paperboard.
“Climax produces boxes for Coach, Bloomingdale’s, Eddie Bauer, and Godiva just to name a few of their retail customers … If you buy any deli products at supermarket stores such as Walmart, Kroger, Wegmans, or Stop & Shop, you’ll walk out with a Climax package … When you open a pharmaceutical container and complain about the tamper-proof device covering the bottle, Climax produced the paper base … And while you are admiring the beautiful photo in your living room, the special matte paper probably came from the Climax Paperboard company,” says Patrick J. Purdy, CEO of Climax.
Samuel Hirschey’s dream lives on but is no longer guided by the family. The third generation sold Climax Manufacturing Co. in May 2008 in a stock deal to an investor group headed by Delta Point Capital Management, LLC of Rochester, a private-equity fund manager. The buyers formed Climax, LLC. Co-investors included Hamilton Lane, headquartered near Philadelphia with approximately $23 billion in discretionary assets under management along with oversight of an additional
$135 billion in advisory assets (March 31, 2012) and NewSpring Capital of Radnor, Pa., which provided $5 million of mezzanine financing. Hamilton Lane invested funds provided by the New York State Common Retirement Fund. Key corporate managers have also made investments in Climax.
Climax, LLC then bought the assets of the St. Joseph Packaging company in St. Joseph, Mo. in November 2009 and certain assets of the Brownville Paper Company near Watertown.
Today, the business has three operating corporations: Climax Paperboard, Inc. in Carthage; Climax Manufacturing Company, which makes up the original packaging business, in Lowville; and Climax Packaging, Inc. in Missouri. The fourth corporation is the holding company, Climax Acquisition, Inc. The six board members of the holding company include George Yancey, Samuel Villanti, Thomas Merkel, David Waterman of Delta Point, David Helgerson of Hamilton Lane, and Pat Purdy.
Company’s growth stats
According to Purdy, “The businesses generate $100 million annually in revenue, $40 million from papermaking and
$60 million from packaging. The paper business has three different product lines: matte board, which produces $10 million annually, cap-closure, which is approaching $10 million, and packaging board both for Climax Packaging and for outside customers, which generates $20 million in revenue. The packaging-business revenue is split approximately 55 percent from retail sales and the balance from deli and other sales.” Purdy says that “… today Climax has 350 employees. The paper mill employs 80, St. Joseph’s employs another 80, and the Lowville [packaging] operation nearly 200.”
Climax owns the real estate both at the Lowville and Carthage sites. The former facility contains about 110,000 to 115,000 square feet of a converted shopping mall, while the latter encompasses 100,000 square feet of a mill built in the 1800s. Climax also rents warehousing space in Castorland and in Oswego and rents the real estate in Missouri. Climax sold off its fleet of trucks, and its only transportation asset is a small locomotive to move rail cars along its half-mile spur.
Purdy, a veteran of decades of employment in papermaking and packaging for Fortune 500 companies, came to Climax in 2004 at the request of the Hirschey family. The paper mill was losing $5 million annually. Purdy’s first assignment was to make the plant profitable. His second was to take over the reins as CEO. And the third was to prepare the business for sale. Today, “Climax Paperboard runs 24/7, closing only for holidays and for scheduled maintenance. We are at 100 percent of capacity and very profitable,” says Purdy, who also notes that the company ships product to more than 20 countries outside the U.S.
The packaging plant, which saw revenues drop 50 percent in the most recent recession, has rebounded to its pre-recession level of sales and profitability.
“We still have unused capacity in Climax Manufacturing,” says Purdy. “Climax [Manufacturing] sells 95 percent of our product through direct-sales with the remaining 5 percent sold through a distributor network … We offer full-service packaging from creative design to printing, laminating, die-cutting, embossing, gluing, and folding, and our two locations give us access to new customers .. We are looking to grow by entering adjacent markets, such as the quick-food and beverage industries.”
When asked about the reasons for the company’s rebound, Purdy attributes it “… first to a focus on customer needs. Climax listens to its customers and follows industry trends closely … Second, we are responsive, creative, and concerned about maintaining the best quality in the industry … Third, we have a talented and dedicated work force. Many of our employees followed in the footsteps of their fathers, grandfathers, and even great-grandfathers.”
All three plants are represented by unions. Two locals of the United Steel Workers represent the New York operations while the Teamsters Union represents the Missouri plant.
“To say this business is capital-intensive is an understatement,” quips Purdy. A tour of the New York plants reveals major investments in both plant and equipment, including millions of dollars to make the production process environmentally friendly.
“Climax Paperboard captures 90 percent of its waste heat which is recycled to warm the water from the river to create the slurry which begins the papermaking process. The heat is originally generated from natural gas and hydro-electricity and our recycling of water limits our discharge … Almost all of our paperboard is made from 100 percent recycled fiber,” Purdy explains.
In addition to the CEO Purdy, the key management team includes Mark Godfrey, CFO and COO of Climax. Godfrey worked for major national corporations such as Rubbermaid and GE, before joining Delta Point as a turnaround specialist. Jill Boliver is vice president of administration; Michael Lambert is vice president of paperboard sales; Pete Dawes is vice president of sales, packaging; and plant managers are Walt Hovendon (Carthage), Dave Kisker (Lowville), and Kerry Stadel (St. Joseph, Mo.). Also, Robyn Nortz joined Climax two years ago as the quality manager, a position she had held at DuPont.
Sutton Real Estate adds to presence in Oswego
OSWEGO — A real-estate development group in Syracuse has acquired Midtown Plaza in Oswego. Sutton Real Estate will manage and lease the property for the new owner, SRE-Midtown Acquisitions, LLC. The 68,000-square-foot retail center is in the heart of Oswego, according to Sutton. The building includes two floors of retail and office space including a
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
OSWEGO — A real-estate development group in Syracuse has acquired Midtown Plaza in Oswego.
Sutton Real Estate will manage and lease the property for the new owner, SRE-Midtown Acquisitions, LLC. The 68,000-square-foot retail center is in the heart of Oswego, according to Sutton.
The building includes two floors of retail and office space including a Rite Aid Pharmacy, Jo-Ann Fabric, The Green Planet Grocery, New York State Off-Track Betting, and Oswego County Opportunities.
Sutton is involved in other projects in Oswego, including rehabilitation of the former Seaway Supply Building into apartments. The firm also manages the Stevedore Building for another development group.
The firm has found Oswego a good place to work, Sutton Real Estate President Louis Fournier says. Support from city and county economic-development officials is a big reason, he adds.
“A lot of it is finding good people to work with,” he says. “It’s a great place to do business. They want you to succeed.”
Midtown Plaza is about 50 percent leased. Sutton plans to seek similar types of tenants to fill the remainder of the building.
The firm is also in talks with local officials about a city-owned garage in front of Midtown, Fournier says. Sutton may look to acquire the garage and transform it into a mixed use or retail development.
Combining that possible project with the existing Midtown Plaza is an attractive option, Fournier says. Sutton is planning some cosmetic improvements at Midtown regardless of what happens with the garage, he adds.
The firm plans to paint, perform some general repair work, and fix some concrete around the site.
The company has a groundbreaking ceremony scheduled for Sept. 7 on the Seaway Supply Building, located at 472 W. First St. The $4 million affordable-housing project will transform the vacant building into 26 one- and two-bedroom apartments.
The effort received a $1.5 million loan from the New York State Housing Trust Fund/HOME and Federal Low Income Housing Tax programs. It also is receiving $450,000 in affordable-housing tax credits and additional historic tax credits.
Developers had the building certified as a historic landmark and it is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The structure dates to the 1880s and originally housed several breweries, Fournier says.
It later served as a produce warehouse and eventually was home to Seaway Supply, a heating, ventilation, and cooling business.
Sutton Real Estate is developing the project with Edgemere Development of Rochester and Rich and Gardner Construction Co. of Syracuse.
The renovations will take nine months to a year to complete. MacKnight Architects is handling design work for the project.
The building will house 20 one-bedroom units and six two-bedroom units when finished. Rich and Gardner is handling the construction work and will gut the entire structure, Fournier says.
Planned additions include a new elevator, a tenant community room and computer lab, an on-site rental office, laundry facilities, and units that are accessible to the physically disabled.
Fournier says workers will maintain much of the original design features and structure. Developers plan to leave original posts and beams and exposed brickwork in place. The finished apartments will be aimed at low- and moderate-income families and individuals.
Contact Tampone at ktampone@cnybj.com
New York manufacturing index plunges below zero in August
Business conditions for New York manufacturers fell apart in August, according to a monthly survey from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The general business conditions index in the New York Fed’s Empire State Manufacturing Survey, which was released Aug. 15, plummeted 13.2 points to -5.9. It is the first time the index dropped
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Business conditions for New York manufacturers fell apart in August, according to a monthly survey from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
The general business conditions index in the New York Fed’s Empire State Manufacturing Survey, which was released Aug. 15, plummeted 13.2 points to -5.9. It is the first time the index dropped below zero since last October.
The negative reading comes as more manufacturers reported worsening business conditions than improving circumstances. Although nearly 22.1 percent of polled manufacturers said business conditions improved in August, 27.9 percent indicated business got worse for them. The remaining survey respondents, about 50 percent, said conditions did not change during the month.
“The August Empire State Manufacturing Survey indicates that conditions for New York manufacturers deteriorated over the month,” the New York Fed said in a report on the survey.
Almost all current indicators — indicators showing how conditions changed from the previous month — fell in the August survey. New orders declined, as the index measuring them slipped 2.8 points to -5.5. The shipments index retracted by 6.2 points to 4.1, showing that growth in shipments sank.
The unfilled-orders index climbed slightly, rising by about 3 points. But it remained firmly underwater at -10.6, indicating more manufacturers saw their quantity of unfilled orders dropping than rising.
Delivery times shortened, according to the delivery-time index. It moved down 5.8 points to -7.1. And inventories thinned out, with the inventories index sliding 8.4 points below its previous reading of zero.
Manufacturers reported feeling the squeeze of prices paid rising faster than prices received in August. The prices-paid index jumped 9.1 points to 16.5, even as the prices-received index edged down 1.4 points to 2.4.
Employment levels increased, but at a slower pace than in the previous month, according to the survey’s number-of-employees index. It dipped by 2.1 points to 16.5. Meanwhile, the average employee-workweek index moved up from 0 by 3.5 points, showing that workers added hours.
Future expectations
Current business-conditions indicators weren’t the only ones to fall in the survey. Its forward-looking indicators, which measure expectations for six months in the future, were also home to nearly across-the-board drops.
“Indexes for the six-month outlook were generally positive but lower than in July, indicating that respondents expected business conditions to improve little in the months ahead,” the New York Fed said in its survey report.
The future general-business conditions index turned down 5 points to 15.2, meaning manufacturers felt less optimistic than in the New York Fed’s July survey. However, hopes for future improvements still predominated in August, with 37.3 percent of manufacturers predicting better business conditions in six months compared to 22.1 percent anticipating worse conditions. The remaining 40.6 percent of survey respondents said conditions will be the same as they are today.
Survey respondents pulled back on their hopes for new orders, as the future new-orders index skidded down 11.2 points to 2.4. Expectations for shipments in six months also bogged down, with the future-shipments index descending 6.6 points to 8.2.
Unfilled orders will be less frequent in coming months, according to the future unfilled-orders index, which slipped 4.4 points to -10.6. It was joined in negative territory by the future delivery time index and the future inventories index. The future delivery-time index ticked up 1.8 points yet remained firmly below zero at -10.6. The future-inventories index followed suit, inching 0.5 points higher to -9.4.
Jumps in both prices paid and prices received are in store, according to manufacturers. The future prices-paid index deflated by 4 points but stayed positive at 31.8. The future prices-received index trimmed 1.9 points from its reading to remain above zero at 14.1.
Manufacturers expect to add employees at a slower rate in six months, as indicated by the future number-of-employees index. It fell 2.6 points to 3.5.
They anticipate a shorter workweek as well. The future average employee-workweek index declined 3.3 points to -8.2.
Capital expenditures and technology spending are still on manufacturers’ plates, albeit less so than in recent surveys. The future capital-expenditures index dropped 6.8 points to 12.9, and the future technology-spending index plunged 12.6 points to 5.9.
“When asked about negative influences on 2012 hiring and capital-spending plans, a majority of respondents cited increased uncertainty about business prospects,” the New York Fed report said.
The New York Fed polls a set pool of about 200 manufacturing executives in the state for its monthly survey, and about 100 executives typically respond. The Fed seasonally adjusts data.
Contact Seltzer at rseltzer@cnybj.com
Wireless Grids in talks with new potential clients
SYRACUSE — A Syracuse University (SU) technology spinoff is aiming to land contracts in a number of new markets in the coming months. Wireless Grids
Small-business optimism slips again in July
Sagging earnings underpinned a dip in small-business owners’ optimism in July, according to a monthly index from the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB). The NFIB reported that its Small Business Optimism Index slipped 0.2 points to 91.2, remaining at “recession levels.” It has declined for three consecutive months, although July’s decrease is smaller than
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Sagging earnings underpinned a dip in small-business owners’ optimism in July, according to a monthly index from the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB).
The NFIB reported that its Small Business Optimism Index slipped 0.2 points to 91.2, remaining at “recession levels.” It has declined for three consecutive months, although July’s decrease is smaller than a 3-point drop that took place in June.
Optimism eroded in July as one of the index’s components, earnings, headed south. Seasonally adjusted, a net -27 percent of small-business owners reported higher earnings in the last three months versus the prior three months — a decrease of 5 points.
The negative result shows business owners primarily generated lower earnings. That’s because the NFIB calculates net percentages by subtracting pessimistic survey responses from optimistic responses. Positive net percentages reflect predominantly optimistic business owners, while negative percentages indicate widespread pessimism.
New York director’s comments
The Small Business Optimism Index is a nationwide reading, but New York’s small-business owners are also losing confidence, according to NFIB New York State Director Mike Durant.
He says two topics related to the state’s government are hurting owners’ confidence: a legislative proposal to increase the minimum wage, and a potential increase in Thruway tolls.
“In New York, I think that business owners that were NFIB members were starting to feel somewhat confident as 2011 went into 2012,” Durant says. “As [the legislative] session ended and we went into minimum-wage increase talks and toll hikes, I think they’re feeling somewhat less optimism.”
July’s national optimism-index results are the first showing business owners’ reactions to June’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling upholding the federal health-care reform law. The NFIB is one of the parties that sued the federal government over the law.
The court’s ruling may have had a relatively small impact on business owners’ collective outlook because they were expecting the law to be implemented, Durant says. And in New York, many business owners seem to feel that the law will have less of an immediate effect because the state’s costs are already inflated, he adds.
“Health-care costs are already high in New York,” Durant says. “It’s going to take a while if the act is implemented for that to be felt here.”
Other survey findings
The other components of the optimism index were a mixed bag in July. Plans to hire in the next three months ticked up 2 percentage points to a seasonally adjusted net 5 percent. But the portion of business owners unable to fill open job positions remained the same as in June, 15 percent, seasonally adjusted.
Plans to increase inventories in the next three to six months edged down 1 point to a seasonally adjusted net -1 percent. Current inventory satisfaction, meanwhile, remained unchanged for the fourth straight month. Seasonally adjusted, a net 0 percent of small-business owners said their inventories were too low.
Capital-expenditure plans were also unchanged from the previous month, with 21 percent of small-business owners planning to make a capital expenditure in the next three to six months. And the portion of business owners who judged the next three months to be a good time to expand held steady as well at 5 percent, seasonally adjusted.
Business owners predicted having more difficulty borrowing. A net -7 percent of regular borrowers anticipated easier credit conditions during the next three months, a rise of just 1 point.
Sales expectations slipped by 1 point, resulting in a net -4 percent of survey respondents anticipating higher sales in the next three months, seasonally adjusted.
Owners remained largely sour on the prospects for general business conditions. Seasonally adjusted, a net -8 percent said conditions will be better six months from now, which is up 2 points from last month.
Government requirements and red tape tied with taxes as the problems cited by the most small-business owners as their single most important. Each problem was named by 21 percent of survey respondents. Poor sales proved to be the third-most mentioned problem, as 20 percent of respondents named it.
The NFIB is a nonprofit organization with members in 50 states and Washington, D.C. It randomly surveyed 1,803 of its member businesses in the month of July to develop the optimism index.
Nonprofits face pressure to merge or affiliate
“In business, you have to lead, follow or get out of the way.” — Lee Iacocca Gov. Cuomo has taken dead aim at the nonprofit sector in New York State, with particular emphasis on those agencies funded with state dollars. After issuing an executive order in January on CEO compensation and administrative cost
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
“In business, you have to lead, follow or get out of the way.” — Lee Iacocca
Gov. Cuomo has taken dead aim at the nonprofit sector in New York State, with particular emphasis on those agencies funded with state dollars. After issuing an executive order in January on CEO compensation and administrative cost caps for nonprofits, he released the proposed implementing regulations in May. Read them at http://www.governor.ny.gov/press/05162012State-Funded-Providers.
The message is clear. Gov. Cuomo and his administration are demanding more efficiency from New York nonprofits. While many have argued and debated the merits of his two edicts, I am reminded of the famous Iacocca quote above.
Gov. Cuomo’s two executive orders essentially require the following from any New York State nonprofit that receives more than 30 percent of its revenue from the state:
1. CEO compensation is capped at an amount not to exceed $199,000 per year. In other words, no state funding source will reimburse a nonprofit for more than $199,000 of CEO compensation. In his executive order, Cuomo referenced his own salary at $179,000 per year.
2. Within two years, administrative costs for state-funded nonprofits will not exceed 15 percent of total costs. There is a phase-in period which allows for 25 percent in this fiscal year and 20 percent in fiscal year 2014, with 15 percent thereafter. Administrative costs are broadly defined in the proposed regulations and generally include more than just agency administrative costs.
These two executive orders have and will continue to generate significant discussion in the board room, management meetings, and statewide provider associations. There are provisions which allow for waiver applications and exemptions to be granted. However, it is clear that every nonprofit organization must assess the effect of these regulations.
The impact of these proposals extends far beyond the specifics of the regulations. If enacted, after expected legal challenges, these new requirements will continue to place significant pressure on many nonprofits to merge or affiliate with other organizations. This predicted result is what I have referred to as the “WalMarting” of the nonprofit sector.
The following lists provide the primary external and internal factors which support my prediction of increased merger and affiliation activity. Therefore, maintaining autonomy may not be the best alternative strategy at this point.
External factors include the following:
• “Bigger is better and more efficient” in the eyes of government
• Fewer providers = less cost
• Aggregation / transfer of financial risk = less state administrative cost
• Government views smaller providers as “higher risk”
• Networking and consortiums may create favorable contracting leverage
Internal factors impacting agency strategy are as follows:
• Maintaining sophistication in information technology
• Affordability of electronic medical records and documentation
• Maintaining regulatory-compliance requirements
• ncreased regulatory-enforcement scrutiny and audits
• Pressure on administrative efficiency and cost
As you consider my strategic analysis of the nonprofit sector and the affiliation spectrum from autonomy to acquisition, please consider the following statistics:
• Fewer than 200,000 of the nation’s 1.4 million nonprofits reported expenses of more than $100,000 — less than 15 percent.
• Only 55,000 nonprofits reported expenses of more than $1 million — less than 5 percent.
There have been many local examples of success in tax-exempt service organizations collaborating to achieve an effective fulfillment of their collective mission. I believe that every nonprofit organization should have the strategic objective of continuing to assess the impact and outcomes of program services, while effectively managing the cost of service delivery.
In fact, every nonprofit should be able to candidly evaluate and answer the following two questions:
–What strategies can we implement that will make our organization more cost effective with improved-service outcomes?
–What are the non-core competencies of our organization that could benefit from a strategic affiliation?
The external and internal factors described above necessitate action on the part of all tax-exempts to assess their strategic position in relation to the mission of the organization. The nonprofit board and management team must evaluate affiliations along a continuum of alternatives, from contractual relationships to structural affiliations.
The following 10-point continuum should be helpful to management and board members of nonprofits facing the challenges and opportunities presented by affiliation opportunities. The points in this continuum progress from autonomy to acquisition. In between these two ends of the affiliation spectrum, we have:
Co-optition. A true blend of cooperation and competition between service providers.
An example of co-optition is the willingness of multiple hospitals in urban areas to provide admitting privileges to the same
physician. The ability to cross competitive boundaries and accomplish benefits for both organizations is the key element of co-optition.
Collaboration. The spirit of collaboration covers a wide variety of relationships, typically supported by some form of letter agreement or memorandum of understanding. Collaborations between and among nonprofits occur every day in our community in multiple situations.
A common example of collaboration is the fact that multiple nonprofit service providers apply for third-party funding from our local United Way or grant-making foundations. The local community foundation also supports a number of joint collaborative efforts in its grant-making activities. In the current environment, these community funders are intent on achieving maximum benefit and outcomes on a cost-effective basis from their financial support.
Shared-service agreement. The first step in contractual affiliations, generally motivated by a desire to accomplish cost reduction through economies of scale and/or to enhance quality of services.
The focal point in this area is now on administrative and support functions, commonly referred to as non-core competencies. There is a general belief that sharing administrative services is the best and first step in establishing the solid relationships necessary for two or more organizations to move along the continuum.
Contractual affiliation. Commonly referred to as the “engagement” before “marriage” (or, in this case, merger). Typically, in this phase of the continuum, you will see shared decision-making, financial risk, and an interdependence of each organization that is party to the agreement.
A common example exists when administrative support, decision-making, and related services are provided to one organization by another. Another example is collaboration on the delivery of program services by multiple providers.
Network formation. Driven by a changing marketplace, most often under the umbrella of consolidated-funding sources, case-management initiatives and/or coordinated intake/service delivery.
The federal and state governments have sponsored a number of network initiatives for many years. The most visible example, depending upon where you live in the state, is the development and funding of rural-health-network initiatives.
Joint venture. Typically two or more organizations with separate governance and decision-making authority coming together to form an entity to address a particular service need.
A common objective in this model is cost efficiency and improved outcomes. There are many examples of joint ventures in providing services to the elderly and their caregivers, as well as addressing the educational needs of our youth.
Partnership/corporation. A separate legal entity formed requiring capital contributions or dues and separate governance, and typically devoted to a common need for all partners. Risk and reward are shared among partners on terms specified in the partnership or shareholders’ agreement.
Most urban areas have developed a regional hospital association and health information organization. These are two examples of health-care service providers in partnership to address their joint group-purchasing needs, data-information sharing, and other matters of material interest.
Merger. When two become one.
With thousands of nonprofit organizations in the primary urban areas of the state, the current environment would appear ripe for affiliation initiatives to produce both cost savings and improved outcomes.
Finally, at the other end of the spectrum is acquisition, generally a four-letter word in the continuum for the acquired party in the transaction.
Most often in the nonprofit sector, merger is the preferred terminology, regardless of the structure of the transaction. The desire of independent boards and management teams to “maintain their authority and decision-making control” can make an acquisition difficult to achieve, other than in situations of fiscal distress.
Remember to keep your eyes focused on the mission of your organization. Do not allow the issues of who gets what job or who gets what number of votes to dictate your decision regarding any points along this continuum.
Gerald J. Archibald, CPA, is a partner in charge of the management advisory services at The Bonadio Group. He can be reached at (585) 381-1000, or via email at garchibald@bonadio.com
Stay up-to-date on the companies, people and issues that impact businesses in Syracuse, Central New York and beyond.