A Few proposed regulation by President Joe Biden’s Department Of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) would once again attempt to meddle in state and local governments’ affairs by conditioning federal funding including Community Development Block Grants on changes to local zoning laws. The rule, once again titled, “Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing,” was offered in January […]
Get Instant Access to This Article
Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
- Critical Central New York business news and analysis updated daily.
- Immediate access to all subscriber-only content on our website.
- Get a year's worth of the Print Edition of The Central New York Business Journal.
- Special Feature Publications such as the Book of Lists and Revitalize Greater Binghamton, Mohawk Valley, and Syracuse Magazines
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
A Few proposed regulation by President Joe Biden’s Department Of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) would once again attempt to meddle in state and local governments’ affairs by conditioning federal funding including Community Development Block Grants on changes to local zoning laws.
The rule, once again titled, “Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing,” was offered in January and includes “working with a local government to address exclusionary zoning,” and “if disparities by protected class group are identified in the questions regarding homeownership opportunities, responsive goals could include … zoning code reform,” and “this rule requires an analysis of barriers to affordable housing, representing a key opportunity for program participants to identify the policies and practices, such as land use and zoning ordinances, that impede the development and maintenance of affordable housing commensurate with need.”
The regulation also requires grantees to assess: “How have existing zoning and land use policies or ordinances, the presence or lack of source of income anti-discrimination laws, eviction policies and practices, and other State and local policies or practices contributed to the patterns of segregation…” and “This analysis shall include… municipal or State policies, such as zoning and land use policies, ordinances, or regulations…”
And so forth. There is just one problem. It’s illegal as Congress has six times defunded the original 2015 regulation that had included an explicit requirement calling for changes to local zoning, stating, “This final rule, and Assessment Tools and guidance to be issued, will assist recipients of Federal funding to use that funding and, if necessary, adjust their land use and zoning laws in accordance with their existing legal obligation to affirmatively further fair housing.”
This is why Congress moved to defund the original Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing regulation, in the 2017 omnibus, the 2018 omnibus, the 2019 omnibus, and the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2020 and the 2021 omnibus, before it was removed in the 2022 omnibus. But then it was included again in the 2023 omnibus, and so still remains standing law.
Here, HUD appears to be saying that doesn’t matter, it’s just going to keep issuing the same exact regulation.
And so, now House Republicans appear poised to defund it yet again in the 2024 transportation and housing appropriations bill, appearing in section 233, updating the language to reflect the most recent regulation in whack-a-mole fashion: “None of the funds made available by this 24 Act may be used to implement, administer, or enforce the proposed rule entitled ‘Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing’ published by the Department of Housing and Urban Development in the Federal Register on Feb. 9, 2023 (88 Fed. Reg. 8516), or to direct a grantee to undertake specific changes to existing zoning laws as a part of carrying out the interim final rule entitled ‘Restoring Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Definitions and Certifications’ published by such Department in the Federal Register on June 10, 2021 (86 Fed. Reg. 30779).”
These provisions for years have explicitly changed the terms and conditions of the Fair Housing Act, barring the federal government from directing or encouraging grantees to make changes to local zoning.
The provision was originally drawn from a provision by Sen. Susan Collins (R–Maine) passed the Senate easily 87-9 in 2016 that barred the regulation from being used to affect local zoning.
The regulation was also rescinded by the Trump administration, under a rule, called Preserving Community and Neighborhood Choice, which states, “It must be local governments, not HUD, that exercise control of administering local housing policies, including zoning and development policies that are unique to a particular community.”
This law may be all that stands in the way of a Biden presidency renewing the federal war on suburbs, eliminating one of the most important responsibilities of local government — zoning. But to make it stick, Congress will have to continue to intervene via the appropriations process unless it can make a more-permanent alteration to law. For now, Congress appears poised to continue to play whack-a-mole with the provision as HUD simply defies the law.
Robert Romano is the VP of public policy at Americans for Limited Government (ALG). The organization says it is a “non-partisan, nationwide network committed to advancing free-market reforms, private property rights, and core American liberties.”
