Study: Number of workers eligible for health coverage at work rises

A new study from the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI) finds the number of workers eligible to receive health insurance through their job rose from 2014 through 2018, despite offer rates from employers “slowly declining.” The Employee Benefit Research Institute says it is a nonprofit research institute based in Washington, D.C., that focuses on health, savings, […]

Already an Subcriber? Log in

Get Instant Access to This Article

Become a Central New York Business Journal subscriber and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.

new study from the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI) finds the number of workers eligible to receive health insurance through their job rose from 2014 through 2018, despite offer rates from employers “slowly declining.”

The Employee Benefit Research Institute says it is a nonprofit research institute based in Washington, D.C., that focuses on health, savings, retirement, and financial security issues. 

The EBRI issue brief, “More Workers Eligible for Health Coverage Despite Lack of Growth in Employer Offer Rates,” examines how the availability of employment-based health insurance has been changing. It also looks at how the availability may have been affected by the Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010 (Obamacare), as well as the Great Recession of 2007–2009 and the subsequent economic recovery.

“Despite the lack of an increase in offer rates, the percentage of workers eligible for health coverage through their job continued its upward trend,” Paul Fronstin, director of the health research and education program at EBRI, said in a news release about the research. “Between 2014 and 2018, the percentage of workers eligible for health coverage increased from 75.4 percent to 78 percent. We believe this increase is likely due to changes in the composition of the work force. We found a shift to full-time employment, fewer workers considered low-wage, and a shift to larger firms.”

Affordable Care Act impact

The ACA requires employers with 50 or more employees to either offer health-insurance coverage or pay a penalty. Employers with fewer than 50 employees are exempt from this provision. However, the law includes a number of provisions intended to make it easier for small employers to obtain coverage for their employees, including insurance-market reforms, the Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP) or health-insurance exchanges, and small employer tax credits. 

Obamacare also required that individuals have health-insurance coverage or pay a penalty, though the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 eliminated the financial penalty for not having health insurance starting in 2019.

HRA effect

The EBRI issue brief also explores the future implications of the Trump Administration’s final rule to expand the use of stand-alone health-reimbursement arrangements (HRAs) by employers of all sizes. 

HRAs are employer-owned and funded accounts that help workers pay for qualified medical expenses not covered by their health plans. 

Under the final rule, employers would be able to offer a stand-alone HRA that employees could then use to purchase health insurance in the non-group market. The HRA would have to be used to purchase ACA-compliant plans and would have to meet ACA-affordability requirements in order for the employer to meet the shared-responsibility requirement. 

The HRA would not be subject to ERISA if certain conditions were met and there is no limit to the amount of money that an employer can contribute to an HRA. ERISA is short for the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, “a federal law that sets minimum standards for most voluntarily established retirement and health plans in private industry to provide protection for individuals in these plans,” per the website of the U.S. Department of Labor.

The Trump Administration expects about 800,000 employers will offer stand-alone HRAs by 2024 and beyond. As a result, some 10.7 million individuals would be covered by such an HRA by 2027 and 6.8 million fewer workers (and their dependents) would have traditional employment-based health coverage.

“Ultimately, employers may decide that they no longer need to offer health benefits to be competitive in the labor market during the next recession, and the combination of the insurance-market reforms and the ability to give workers tax-free money to purchase health insurance on their own may finally put the future of employment-based health coverage to the test,” said Fronstin.      

Contact Reinhardt at ereinhardt@cnybj.com

Eric Reinhardt

Recent Posts

SHA, HUD make local announcement about $50 million to help redevelop Syracuse public housing near I-81

SYRACUSE, N.Y. — A late Wednesday morning ceremony at Wilson Park in Syracuse included the…

10 hours ago

Severe storm spreads damage across Rome

ROME, N.Y. — The city of Rome continues to clean up from a devastating, confirmed…

11 hours ago

SUNY launches venture-capital fund for startups on a SUNY campus

SYRACUSE, N.Y. — SUNY officials on Monday announced the launch of Upstate Biotech Ventures, a…

11 hours ago

Oswego Health says first robotically assisted surgery performed at its surgery center

OSWEGO, N.Y. — Oswego Health says it had the system’s first robotically assisted surgery using…

2 days ago
Advertisement

Tioga State Bank to open Johnson City branch

JOHNSON CITY, N.Y. — Tioga State Bank (TSB) will open a new branch in Johnson…

2 days ago

Oneida County Childcare Taskforce outlines recommendations to improve childcare

UTICA, N.Y. — A report by the Oneida County Childcare Taskforce made a number of…

2 days ago