On July 3, 2024, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Hon. Ada Brown, U.S.D.J.) issued a memorandum opinion and order enjoining the enforcement of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) non-compete rule. In so doing, the court held that the plaintiff, Ryan LLC, was likely to succeed on the merits of […]
On July 3, 2024, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Hon. Ada Brown, U.S.D.J.) issued a memorandum opinion and order enjoining the enforcement of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) non-compete rule. In so doing, the court held that the plaintiff, Ryan LLC, was likely to succeed on the merits of its claim that the FTC exceeded its rulemaking authority by issuing a substantive rule banning most non-compete clauses and otherwise acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner. The district court further found that the plaintiff would suffer imminent irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction, the equities decidedly tipped in plaintiff’s favor, and the granting of the requested injunction serves the public interest. However, the court made clear that the injunction was limited to the specific plaintiff and does not extend beyond the parties to that specific litigation. In other words, while the order is indisputably a victory for those who seek to challenge the legality of the non-compete ban, it does not have any impact on the millions of other individuals and businesses impacted by the FTC non-compete ban. The court did make clear in its order that it will issue a decision on the merits of the litigation (i.e., the legality of the FTC’s non-compete ban) no later than Aug. 30 of this year. The current effective date of the FTC non-compete ban is Sept. 4. As such, given the close proximity in time between the Northern District of Texas’s anticipated decision date and the effective date of the FTC non-compete ban, businesses need to take appropriate steps to prepare for the possibility that the FTC non-compete ban goes into effect. Such steps should include identifying any “workers,” both current and former, who may be subject to non-competes and preparing, but not sending, the notices required by the FTC non-compete ban. We will continue to closely monitor the situation and provide updates as they become available.
Bradley A. Hoppe is a member (partner) in the Buffalo office of Syracuse–based law firm Bond, Schoeneck & King PLLC. He is a litigation attorney who handles a wide range of business, commercial, and municipal matters at the trial and appellate levels in both state and federal court. Contact Hoppe at bhoppe@bsk.com. This article is drawn and edited from the law firm’s website.